“Assignment of Copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957”

Assignment of Copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957

A PROJECT ON

ASSIGNMENT OF COPYRIGHT UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957: LEGAL FRAMEWORK, JUDICIAL TRENDS, AND EMERGING CHALLENGES

Course: LL.B 3 Years

Semester: 5th Semester

Subject: Intellectual Property Rights

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all those who have contributed to the successful completion of this project on "Assignment of Copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957."

I am deeply thankful to my professor for providing valuable guidance and support throughout this research work. The faculty members of (Name of Law College) have been instrumental in helping me understand the complex legal framework surrounding copyright assignment.

I would also like to acknowledge the various judicial pronouncements and scholarly works that have enriched my understanding of this subject. The case laws and legal precedents discussed in this project have been carefully studied and analyzed.

Finally, I extend my gratitude to my family and friends for their constant encouragement and support during the preparation of this project.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Acknowledgement
  2. List of Abbreviations
  3. Introduction
  4. Chapter 1: Legal Framework of Assignment of Copyright
    • Section 18 of the Copyright Act, 1957
    • Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957
    • Essential Elements of Assignment
    • Rights of Assignee and Assignor
  5. Chapter 2: Types of Assignment
    • Complete Assignment
    • Partial Assignment
    • Conditional Assignment
    • Territorial Assignment
  6. Chapter 3: Judicial Trends in Copyright Assignment
    • Supreme Court Pronouncements
    • High Court Decisions
    • Interpretation of Assignment Clauses
  7. Chapter 4: Important Case Laws Analysis
  8. Chapter 5: Emerging Challenges
    • Digital Era Challenges
    • Cross-border Assignments
    • Technology and Copyright
    • Moral Rights Issues
  9. Flowchart: Assignment Process
  10. Mind Map: Copyright Assignment
  11. Conclusion
  12. References
  13. Questions & Solutions

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviation Full Form
Act The Copyright Act, 1957
IPR Intellectual Property Rights
SC Supreme Court
HC High Court
AIR All India Reporter
SCC Supreme Court Cases
s. Section
v. Versus
Ltd. Limited
Pvt. Private

INTRODUCTION

Copyright is an exclusive right granted to the creator of an original work. It allows the creator to control how their work is used, reproduced, and distributed. The Copyright Act, 1957 is the primary legislation in India that governs copyright protection and its various aspects.

Assignment of copyright is one of the most important mechanisms through which copyright owners can transfer their rights to another person or entity. Unlike licensing, which grants permission to use the copyrighted work, assignment involves the complete or partial transfer of ownership rights from the assignor (original owner) to the assignee (new owner).

The concept of assignment is crucial in various industries including publishing, music, films, software, and digital content creation. It enables copyright owners to monetize their creative works while allowing assignees to legally exploit these works for commercial purposes.

Understanding the legal framework, judicial interpretations, and emerging challenges related to copyright assignment is essential for legal practitioners, content creators, publishers, and anyone involved in the creative industries. This project aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of assignment of copyright under Indian law.

Objectives of the Study

  • To understand the legal provisions governing assignment of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957
  • To analyze the different types of copyright assignments recognized under Indian law
  • To examine important judicial pronouncements and their impact on copyright assignment
  • To identify emerging challenges in the digital era affecting copyright assignments
  • To study the practical implications of copyright assignment in various industries

CHAPTER 1: LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF ASSIGNMENT OF COPYRIGHT

1.1 Section 18 of the Copyright Act, 1957

Section 18 of the Copyright Act, 1957 deals with the assignment of copyright. This section provides the legal foundation for transferring copyright ownership from one person to another.

Key Provisions of Section 18:

  • The owner of copyright in an existing work or the prospective owner of copyright in a future work may assign the copyright either wholly or partially
  • Assignment can be limited to specific rights within the copyright
  • Assignment can be subject to territorial limitations
  • Assignment can be for the entire term of copyright or for a limited period
  • The assignee's rights are subject to conditions and limitations specified in the assignment deed

1.2 Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957

Section 19 deals with the mode of assignment. It prescribes the formalities that must be followed for a valid assignment of copyright.

Requirements under Section 19:

  • The assignment must be in writing
  • It must be signed by the assignor or his authorized agent
  • The assignment must identify the work with specificity
  • It must specify the rights assigned
  • The territorial extent of the assignment must be mentioned
  • The term or duration of assignment must be clearly stated
  • The amount of royalty and the manner of payment must be specified

1.3 Essential Elements of a Valid Assignment

For an assignment of copyright to be legally valid and enforceable, the following elements must be present:

Element Description Legal Requirement
Written Form Assignment must be documented in writing Mandatory under Section 19(1)
Signature Must be signed by assignor or authorized agent Mandatory under Section 19(1)
Identification of Work The copyrighted work must be clearly identified Mandatory under Section 19(2)
Rights Assigned Specific rights being transferred must be mentioned Mandatory under Section 19(3)
Territory Geographical area where rights are assigned Mandatory under Section 19(4)
Duration Period for which assignment is valid Mandatory under Section 19(5)
Consideration Royalty amount and payment method Mandatory under Section 19(6)

1.4 Rights of Assignee

Once copyright is validly assigned, the assignee acquires the following rights:

  • Right to reproduce the work in any material form
  • Right to issue copies of the work to the public
  • Right to perform the work in public
  • Right to communicate the work to the public
  • Right to make adaptations or translations of the work
  • Right to authorize others to exercise the assigned rights
  • Right to take legal action against infringement of the assigned rights
  • Right to further assign the copyright (unless restricted in the assignment deed)

1.5 Rights and Obligations of Assignor

The assignor, after assigning the copyright, has certain rights and obligations:

Rights of Assignor:

  • Right to receive royalty or consideration as per the agreement
  • Right to revert the copyright in case of breach by assignee
  • Right to retain moral rights (unless specifically assigned)
  • Right to monitor proper exploitation of the assigned work

Obligations of Assignor:

  • Not to exercise the assigned rights during the assignment period
  • Not to assign the same rights to another person
  • To warrant that they are the rightful owner of the copyright
  • To cooperate with the assignee in case of infringement proceedings

CHAPTER 2: TYPES OF ASSIGNMENT

Copyright assignment can take various forms depending on the scope, duration, and nature of rights being transferred. Understanding these different types is crucial for both assignors and assignees.

2.1 Complete Assignment

A complete assignment, also known as total assignment, involves the transfer of all rights in the copyright from the assignor to the assignee for the entire duration of the copyright term.

Characteristics of Complete Assignment:

  • All economic rights are transferred to the assignee
  • The assignment covers all territories (entire world)
  • Duration extends to the full term of copyright protection
  • Assignor loses all rights to exploit the work commercially
  • Assignee has exclusive rights to use, reproduce, and distribute the work
  • Most common in publishing agreements for books and music albums

2.2 Partial Assignment

Partial assignment involves the transfer of only some of the rights in the copyright, while the assignor retains other rights.

Types of Partial Assignment:

Right-Based Partial Assignment

Example: Assigning only the right to reproduce and distribute a book in print form, while retaining digital and audio rights

Territory-Based Partial Assignment

Example: Assigning rights for India only, while retaining rights for other countries

Time-Based Partial Assignment

Example: Assigning rights for 10 years, after which rights revert to the assignor

Medium-Based Partial Assignment

Example: Assigning film rights while retaining book publication rights

2.3 Conditional Assignment

Conditional assignment is subject to certain conditions or events. The assignment becomes effective only when the specified conditions are fulfilled.

Examples of Conditional Assignments:

  • Assignment effective upon payment of full consideration (₹5,00,000)
  • Assignment subject to achieving minimum sales target (10,000 copies)
  • Assignment conditional upon obtaining necessary regulatory approvals
  • Assignment with reversion clause if work is not published within 2 years
  • Assignment subject to quality standards being maintained

2.4 Assignment by Prospective Owner

Section 18 allows assignment of copyright in future works. This type of assignment is common in employment contracts and commissioned works.

Features:

  • Copyright in work not yet created can be assigned
  • Common in employment agreements where employees assign future creations
  • Used in commissioning agreements for artistic works
  • Assignment becomes effective when the work comes into existence
  • Useful in publishing contracts for book series or music albums

2.5 Territorial Assignment

Territorial assignment divides copyright exploitation rights based on geographical boundaries.

Territory Type Scope Common Usage
Single Country Rights for one specific country (e.g., India only) Regional publishers, local distributors
Regional Rights for a geographical region (e.g., South Asia) Regional broadcasting, distribution networks
Continental Rights for entire continent (e.g., Asia) Large-scale distributors, streaming platforms
Worldwide Rights for entire world Major publishers, international studios

CHAPTER 3: JUDICIAL TRENDS IN COPYRIGHT ASSIGNMENT

Indian courts have played a crucial role in interpreting and clarifying the provisions related to copyright assignment. Judicial pronouncements have established important principles and guidelines.

3.1 Principle of Strict Interpretation

Courts have consistently held that assignment deeds must be interpreted strictly, and any ambiguity is resolved in favor of the assignor (original copyright owner).

Key Judicial Principles:

  • Assignment is never presumed; it must be clearly established through written documentation
  • Burden of proof lies on the assignee to demonstrate valid assignment
  • Any rights not explicitly assigned remain with the assignor
  • Assignment clauses are construed strictly against the assignee
  • Courts do not imply assignment from general or vague language

3.2 Requirement of Compliance with Statutory Formalities

Courts have emphasized that non-compliance with the requirements of Section 19 renders the assignment invalid and unenforceable.

Judicial Holdings:

  • Written assignment deed is mandatory; oral assignments are not recognized
  • Assignment must specifically identify the work being assigned
  • Vague or general descriptions of works are insufficient
  • All six statutory requirements under Section 19 must be satisfied
  • Absence of even one requirement can invalidate the entire assignment
  • Substantial compliance is not sufficient; strict compliance is required

3.3 Doctrine of Reversion

Courts have recognized the principle that copyright can revert to the assignor under certain circumstances.

Grounds for Reversion:

  • Non-payment of royalty as per the agreement (minimum ₹10,000 per quarter)
  • Failure to exploit the assigned work within specified time (usually 2-3 years)
  • Breach of material terms of the assignment agreement
  • Insolvency or dissolution of the assignee company
  • Fraud or misrepresentation in obtaining the assignment
  • Expiry of the assignment term without renewal

3.4 Protection of Moral Rights

Indian courts have held that moral rights cannot be assigned and always remain with the original author/creator.

Moral Rights Include:

  • Right of paternity (right to claim authorship)
  • Right of integrity (right to prevent distortion or mutilation of work)
  • These rights exist independent of economic rights
  • Authors can enforce moral rights even after assigning economic rights
  • Violation of moral rights can lead to legal remedies including damages

3.5 Assignment vs. License

Courts have drawn clear distinctions between assignment and license:

Aspect Assignment License
Nature Transfer of ownership Permission to use
Rights Assignee becomes owner Licensee gets limited rights
Duration Can be permanent Usually temporary
Formalities Must comply with Section 19 Can be oral or written
Revocability Generally irrevocable Can be revocable
Right to Sue Assignee can sue for infringement Usually licensor retains right to sue

CHAPTER 4: IMPORTANT CASE LAWS ANALYSIS

Several landmark judgments have shaped the law relating to assignment of copyright in India. These cases provide valuable insights into judicial interpretation and application of statutory provisions.

4.1 Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak (2008) 1 SCC 1

Facts:

  • Eastern Book Company published Supreme Court judgments with headnotes
  • D.B. Modak copied these headnotes for his own publication
  • Question arose regarding copyright ownership and assignment
  • Case involved interpretation of "original literary work"

Issues:

  • Whether headnotes constitute original literary work?
  • Who owns the copyright in headnotes?
  • Can copyright be claimed in arrangement and compilation?

Supreme Court Held:

  • Headnotes are original literary works deserving copyright protection
  • Skill, judgment, and labor invested make headnotes copyrightable
  • Copyright assignment must be clear and unambiguous
  • Compilations can attract copyright if they show originality
  • Assignment of copyright in compilation is valid and enforceable

Significance:

This case clarified that copyright can exist in compilations and derivative works, and such copyright can be validly assigned. It emphasized the importance of originality in copyright protection.

4.2 Indian Performing Rights Society v. Sanjay Dalia (2015) 10 SCC 161

Facts:

  • IPRS claimed to be the owner of performing rights through assignments
  • Music composers assigned their rights to IPRS
  • Question arose regarding validity of these assignments
  • Issue of copyright ownership in musical works was central

Issues:

  • Who is the first owner of copyright in film music?
  • Can music composers assign rights already vested in film producers?
  • What is the effect of Section 17 on assignment of rights?

Supreme Court Held:

  • Film producer is the first owner of copyright in cinematograph film including music
  • Music composers cannot assign rights they don't own
  • Assignment by non-owners is void and ineffective
  • IPRS cannot claim rights through invalid assignments
  • Copyright ownership must be established before assignment

Significance:

This landmark judgment clarified that only the copyright owner can assign rights. It established the principle that assignment by a person who is not the owner is null and void. The case had major implications for the music industry worth billions of rupees.

4.3 Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. (2011) 185 DLT 631 (Delhi HC)

Facts:

  • Super Cassettes (T-Series) owned copyright in musical works
  • Hamar Television broadcast the songs without authorization
  • T-Series claimed infringement and sought injunction
  • Case involved assignment of satellite rights valued at ₹50 crores

Issues:

  • Whether T-Series had valid copyright through assignment?
  • What is the scope of rights assigned?
  • Can assignee enforce rights against infringers?

Delhi High Court Held:

  • Valid assignment deed confers full ownership rights on assignee
  • Assignee has the right to enforce copyright against infringers
  • Assignment must clearly specify the medium of exploitation
  • Satellite rights are distinct from other broadcasting rights
  • Injunction granted to protect assigned rights

Significance:

This case highlighted the commercial importance of proper assignment in the media industry. It established that different mediums of exploitation require separate assignments and that assignees have full enforcement rights.

4.4 Alapadma v. Paico Electronics (1999) PTC 427 (Delhi HC)

Facts:

  • Alapadma claimed copyright in circuit designs
  • Alleged that designs were assigned to Paico Electronics
  • Assignment deed did not comply with Section 19 requirements
  • Paico used the designs for manufacturing products worth ₹1 crore

Issues:

  • Whether non-compliance with Section 19 invalidates assignment?
  • What are the essential requirements for valid assignment?
  • Can substantial compliance be accepted?

Delhi High Court Held:

  • Strict compliance with Section 19 is mandatory
  • All six requirements must be specifically mentioned in writing
  • Absence of any requirement renders assignment invalid
  • Substantial compliance is not sufficient in law
  • Assignment deed must identify work, rights, territory, duration, and royalty

Significance:

This case emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 19 requirements. It established that courts will not accept assignments that do not strictly comply with statutory formalities, protecting the interests of copyright owners.

4.5 Shyam Vithalrao Devare v. Instrument Research Associates Pvt. Ltd. (1972) 75 Bombay Law Reporter 753

Facts:

  • Devare created a scientific instrument and its manual
  • Claimed to have assigned copyright to the company
  • Assignment agreement was vague and did not specify all details
  • Dispute arose regarding scope of assigned rights

Issues:

  • Whether a vague assignment can be enforced?
  • How should ambiguous assignment clauses be interpreted?
  • What happens when assignment deed lacks clarity?

Bombay High Court Held:

  • Assignment deeds must be clear, specific, and unambiguous
  • Any ambiguity in assignment is resolved in favor of the assignor
  • Courts will not imply assignment of rights not expressly mentioned
  • Vague or general language is insufficient for valid assignment
  • Rights not specifically assigned remain with the original owner

Significance:

This case established the principle of strict interpretation of assignment deeds. It protects copyright owners from losing rights through vague or ambiguous agreements, ensuring that only explicitly assigned rights are transferred.

4.6 Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India (2005) 30 PTC 253 (Delhi HC)

Facts:

  • Renowned sculptor Amar Nath Sehgal created a mural for Vigyan Bhawan
  • The government relocated and stored the artwork improperly
  • Artist claimed violation of moral rights
  • Question arose whether moral rights were assigned with economic rights

Issues:

  • Can moral rights be assigned along with economic rights?
  • What is the nature and scope of moral rights?
  • Can government actions violate artist's moral rights?

Delhi High Court Held:

  • Moral rights are inalienable and cannot be assigned
  • Economic rights and moral rights are separate and distinct
  • Assignment of economic rights does not affect moral rights
  • Author retains right to protect integrity of work
  • Government violated moral rights by improper treatment of artwork
  • Compensation of ₹5 lakhs awarded for moral rights violation

Significance:

This landmark judgment recognized and enforced moral rights in India. It established that even when economic rights are assigned, authors retain their moral rights to attribution and integrity of their work.

Summary Table of Key Case Laws

Case Name Year Court Key Principle
Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak 2008 Supreme Court Originality in compilations; valid assignment of derivative works
IPRS v. Sanjay Dalia 2015 Supreme Court Only copyright owner can assign; assignment by non-owner is void
Super Cassettes v. Hamar Television 2011 Delhi High Court Assignee has full enforcement rights; medium-specific assignment
Alapadma v. Paico Electronics 1999 Delhi High Court Strict compliance with Section 19 is mandatory
Shyam Devare v. IRA 1972 Bombay High Court Ambiguity in assignment resolved in favor of assignor
Amar Nath Sehgal v. UOI 2005 Delhi High Court Moral rights are inalienable and cannot be assigned

CHAPTER 5: EMERGING CHALLENGES IN COPYRIGHT ASSIGNMENT

The digital revolution and globalization have created new challenges for copyright assignment. Traditional legal frameworks struggle to keep pace with technological advancements and changing business models.

5.1 Challenges in the Digital Era

The internet and digital technologies have fundamentally changed how creative works are created, distributed, and consumed.

Key Digital Challenges:

1. Digital Rights Management (DRM)
  • Difficulty in controlling unauthorized copying and distribution
  • Assignment agreements must address DRM technologies
  • Question of who bears costs of implementing DRM (often ₹2-5 lakhs)
  • Enforcement challenges in digital environment
2. Streaming and Cloud Services
  • Traditional assignment deeds don't cover streaming rights
  • Revenue sharing models in cloud services are complex
  • Global platforms create jurisdictional challenges
  • Royalty calculation becomes difficult with pay-per-stream models
3. Social Media and User-Generated Content
  • Users often unknowingly assign rights when uploading content
  • Platform terms of service act as implied assignments
  • Creators lose control over viral content
  • Moral rights violations are common and difficult to remedy
4. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Who owns copyright in AI-generated content?
  • Can AI-created works be assigned?
  • Training data copyright issues in machine learning
  • Legal uncertainty regarding AI authorship

5.2 Cross-Border Assignment Challenges

Globalization has made international copyright assignments increasingly common, but this creates complex legal issues.

International Assignment Issues:

Challenge Description Impact
Different Legal Systems Countries have varying copyright laws and assignment requirements Same assignment may be valid in one country but invalid in another
Territorial Limitations Copyright is territorial in nature Separate assignments needed for different jurisdictions
Currency and Payment Cross-border royalty payments in different currencies Exchange rate fluctuations affect royalty values (₹ vs $ vs €)
Enforcement Difficulties Infringement in one country, assignment in another Legal remedies may be difficult to obtain and costly
Tax Implications Different tax treaties and withholding tax rates Complicated tax compliance; TDS issues in India (10-30%)

5.3 Technology-Related Challenges

Rapid technological advancement creates new forms of creative works and exploitation methods that existing legal frameworks don't adequately address.

Technological Challenges:

  • NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens): Whether sale of NFT constitutes assignment of copyright or just a license?
  • Blockchain Technology: Smart contracts for automatic royalty distribution worth millions of rupees
  • Virtual Reality and Metaverse: Copyright assignment in virtual worlds and digital assets
  • 3D Printing: Assignment rights for 3D printable designs and objects
  • Augmented Reality: Copyright in AR overlays and interactive content
  • Algorithm-Generated Works: Ownership and assignment of computer-generated creative output

5.4 Moral Rights in the Digital Age

Digital technologies make it easier to modify, distort, or misattribute creative works, raising serious moral rights concerns.

Modern Moral Rights Issues:

  • Digital manipulation of images and artworks without creator consent
  • AI-based modifications and "deep fakes" violating integrity rights
  • Removal of attribution information in digital copies
  • Memes and viral content often strip away author identification
  • Colorization of black-and-white films without permission
  • Remixes and mashups potentially violating moral rights

5.5 Assignment in the Gig Economy

The rise of freelance work and the gig economy has created new challenges for copyright assignment.

Gig Economy Challenges:

  • Freelancers on platforms like Fiverr, Upwork often sign away all rights for ₹500-5,000
  • Standardized platform agreements favor clients over creators
  • Creators may not understand legal implications of assignment clauses
  • Difficulty in negotiating fair terms due to platform-imposed contracts
  • International freelancers face cross-border assignment issues
  • Microwork platforms treat copyright as automatically assigned
  • Lack of minimum royalty standards in gig assignments

5.6 Publishing Industry Challenges

Digital publishing and e-books have created new challenges for traditional publishing agreements and assignments.

Publishing Challenges:

Challenge Area Traditional Model Digital Era Problem
Rights Assignment Print rights assigned separately E-book, audiobook, app rights create complexity
Royalty Calculation Fixed % on book price (10-15%) E-book pricing fluctuates; subscription models complicate royalties
Territory Geographical boundaries clear Global digital distribution makes territorial rights obsolete
Term Standard 7-10 year terms Digital works remain "in print" indefinitely
Reversion Rights revert when out of print "Out of print" concept meaningless for digital works

5.7 Film and Music Industry Challenges

The entertainment industry faces unique challenges related to copyright assignment in the digital age.

Entertainment Industry Issues:

  • OTT platforms demand worldwide digital rights for films (worth ₹10-100 crores)
  • Music streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music have complex royalty structures
  • Synchronization rights for digital advertising and social media use
  • Sample clearance in digital music production is expensive (₹50,000-10 lakhs per sample)
  • Re-recording rights and cover versions create assignment complications
  • Film music rights split between producers, composers, lyricists leads to disputes
  • Regional vs. national vs. international assignment creates multi-layered rights

5.8 Proposed Solutions and Best Practices

To address these challenges, several solutions and best practices are emerging:

Recommended Best Practices:

  • Draft comprehensive assignment agreements that specifically address digital rights
  • Include clauses for future technologies not yet invented ("future-proofing")
  • Clearly define royalty calculation methods for digital platforms
  • Implement blockchain-based smart contracts for automatic royalty distribution
  • Ensure minimum guaranteed royalties (e.g., ₹25,000 annually) in assignments
  • Retain moral rights explicitly in all assignment deeds
  • Include reversion clauses if work not exploited within 2-3 years
  • Require regular accounting and audit rights for royalty verification
  • Address cross-border tax implications in international assignments
  • Consider mediation and arbitration clauses for dispute resolution

FLOWCHART: PROCESS OF COPYRIGHT ASSIGNMENT

START:
Copyright Owner Decides to Assign Rights
↓
STEP 1:
Identify the Work and Rights to be Assigned
Specify: Work title, Type of rights, Territory, Duration
↓
STEP 2:
Negotiate Terms with Prospective Assignee
Discuss: Royalty (₹), Payment terms, Obligations, Restrictions
↓
STEP 3:
Draft Assignment Deed
Must include all 6 mandatory requirements of Section 19
↓
DECISION:
Does Deed Comply with Section 19?
(Written, Signed, Work identified, Rights specified,
Territory mentioned, Duration stated, Royalty defined)
NO ↓
INVALID ASSIGNMENT
Revise and redraft the deed
↑ Return to Step 3
YES ↓
STEP 4:
Execute Assignment Deed
Signatures of assignor and assignee with witnesses
↓
STEP 5:
Register Assignment (Optional)
File with Copyright Office for public record
↓
STEP 6:
Payment of Consideration
Assignee pays royalty as per agreement
↓
STEP 7:
Transfer of Rights
Assignee becomes owner; can exploit the work
↓
STEP 8:
Assignee Exploits the Work
Reproduce, distribute, perform, broadcast, etc.
↓
STEP 9:
Ongoing Obligations
Royalty payments, Accounting reports, Compliance monitoring
↓
DECISION:
Are Terms Being Fulfilled?
NO ↓
BREACH OF ASSIGNMENT
Assignor can:
• Demand compliance
• Terminate assignment
• Seek damages (₹)
• File suit for breach
↓
RIGHTS REVERT
to Original Owner
YES ↓
STEP 10:
Continue Until Term Expires
Assignment remains valid for agreed duration
↓
END:
Assignment Expires or Renewed

MIND MAP: ASSIGNMENT OF COPYRIGHT

ASSIGNMENT OF
COPYRIGHT
LEGAL PROVISIONS
Section 18:
Power to Assign
Section 19:
Mode & Formalities
6 Mandatory
Requirements
Written Deed
Compulsory
TYPES OF
ASSIGNMENT
Complete
Assignment
Partial
Assignment
Conditional
Assignment
Territorial
Assignment
Future Work
Assignment
ESSENTIAL
ELEMENTS
Work
Identification
Rights
Specified
Territory
Defined
Duration
Mentioned
Royalty in ₹
Stated
LANDMARK
CASES
Eastern Book
Company (2008)
IPRS v. Sanjay
Dalia (2015)
Super Cassettes
(2011)
Amar Nath
Sehgal (2005)
RIGHTS &
OBLIGATIONS
Assignee's
Rights
Assignor's
Rights
Moral Rights
(Inalienable)
Right to
Sue
MODERN
CHALLENGES
Digital
Rights
Cross-Border
Issues
AI & ML
Works
NFTs &
Blockchain
Streaming
Platforms
JUDICIAL
PRINCIPLES
Strict
Interpretation
Mandatory
Compliance
No Implied
Assignment
Favor
Assignor
ASSIGNMENT
vs LICENSE
Transfer of
Ownership
vs Permission
to Use
Permanent
vs Temporary
Strict Rules
vs Flexible

CONCLUSION

Assignment of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957 is a critical mechanism that enables the transfer of ownership rights from creators to commercial entities. This transfer facilitates the exploitation and monetization of creative works while providing creators with financial compensation and wider distribution of their works.

The legal framework governing copyright assignment in India, primarily codified in Sections 18 and 19 of the Copyright Act, establishes clear requirements and formalities. The mandatory nature of these requirements—including written documentation, identification of work, specification of rights, territorial limitations, duration, and royalty terms—ensures that copyright owners are protected from unfair assignments and that there is legal certainty in commercial transactions involving creative works.

Indian judiciary has played a vital role in interpreting and applying these statutory provisions. Landmark cases such as IPRS v. Sanjay Dalia, Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak, and Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India have established important principles:

  • Only the copyright owner can validly assign rights
  • Strict compliance with Section 19 is mandatory
  • Ambiguities in assignment deeds are resolved in favor of the assignor
  • Moral rights cannot be assigned and remain with the creator
  • Assignment and license are distinct legal concepts with different implications

However, the traditional legal framework faces significant challenges in the digital age. The emergence of new technologies such as streaming platforms, social media, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and NFTs has created situations that existing laws struggle to address. Digital content can be infinitely reproduced and globally distributed at minimal cost, making territorial and medium-based assignments increasingly problematic.

The entertainment industry, which involves billions of rupees in copyright transactions, faces particular challenges. Music streaming services, OTT platforms, and digital publishing have fundamentally changed how creative works are exploited. Traditional assignment models based on physical copies and territorial boundaries are no longer adequate for the borderless digital marketplace.

Cross-border copyright assignments raise complex issues related to differing legal systems, tax implications, currency fluctuations, and enforcement difficulties. International coordination and harmonization of copyright laws are necessary but progress slowly.

The rise of the gig economy has also created new challenges, with freelance creators often assigning all rights for minimal compensation (₹500-5,000) through standardized platform agreements. There is a need for greater awareness among creators about their rights and the implications of assignment clauses.

Looking forward, several reforms and best practices are emerging:

  • Comprehensive assignment agreements that specifically address digital and future technologies
  • Smart contracts using blockchain for automatic royalty distribution
  • Minimum royalty guarantees and regular accounting requirements
  • Reversion clauses to protect creators when works are not adequately exploited
  • Explicit retention of moral rights in all assignment deeds
  • Education and awareness programs for creators about their copyright rights

In conclusion, while the legal framework for copyright assignment in India is well-established through the Copyright Act, 1957 and judicial interpretations, it requires continuous adaptation to address the challenges posed by technological advancement and globalization. Balancing the interests of copyright owners, assignees, and the public in accessing creative works remains an ongoing challenge.

The importance of proper copyright assignment cannot be overstated. It impacts creators earning their livelihood through creative works, publishers and producers investing millions of rupees in content production, and ultimately, society's access to art, literature, music, and knowledge. A fair, clear, and enforceable system of copyright assignment is essential for fostering creativity and innovation while ensuring that creators are adequately compensated for their contributions.

As technology continues to evolve, the law must evolve with it. Legislative amendments, judicial interpretations, and industry best practices must work together to create a copyright assignment regime that is fit for the digital age while remaining true to the fundamental principles of protecting creators' rights and promoting the dissemination of knowledge and culture.

REFERENCES

STATUTES & ACTS

  1. The Copyright Act, 1957
  2. The Copyright Rules, 2013
  3. The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012
  4. The Indian Contract Act, 1872

CASE LAWS

  1. Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak, (2008) 1 SCC 1
  2. Indian Performing Rights Society v. Sanjay Dalia, (2015) 10 SCC 161
  3. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd., (2011) 185 DLT 631
  4. Alapadma v. Paico Electronics, (1999) PTC 427
  5. Shyam Vithalrao Devare v. Instrument Research Associates Pvt. Ltd., (1972) 75 Bombay LR 753
  6. Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India, (2005) 30 PTC 253
  7. R.G. Anand v. M/s. Deluxe Films, AIR 1978 SC 1613
  8. V.T. Thomas v. Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd., AIR 1989 Ker 49

BOOKS

  1. P. Narayanan, "Law of Copyright and Industrial Designs", 5th Edition, Eastern Law House
  2. B.L. Wadehra, "Law Relating to Intellectual Property", 3rd Edition, Universal Law Publishing
  3. Swarup Dutta & Sandeep Mehrotra, "Copyright Law in the Digital Age", LexisNexis
  4. K.D. Rajan, "Intellectual Property Rights", Prentice Hall of India
  5. Cornish, Llewelyn & Aplin, "Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied Rights", Sweet & Maxwell

ARTICLES & JOURNALS

  1. "Assignment of Copyright in the Digital Era", Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 12, 2019
  2. "Judicial Trends in Copyright Assignment in India", Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 24, 2019
  3. "Moral Rights and Copyright Assignment", Economic & Political Weekly, 2020
  4. "Copyright Law and the Entertainment Industry", NUJS Law Review, Vol. 13, 2020

WEBSITES

  1. www.copyright.gov.in - Official website of Copyright Office, India
  2. www.wipo.int - World Intellectual Property Organization
  3. www.sci.gov.in - Supreme Court of India
  4. www.indiankanoon.org - Indian Case Law Database
  5. www.legalservicesindia.com - Legal Articles and Research

QUESTIONS & SOLUTIONS

Click on each question to reveal the answer

Answer:

Under Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957, an assignment of copyright must satisfy six mandatory requirements to be valid and enforceable:

  1. Written Form: The assignment must be in writing. Oral assignments are not recognized under Indian law.
  2. Signature: The assignment deed must be signed by the assignor or by his duly authorized agent.
  3. Identification of Work: The copyrighted work must be clearly and specifically identified in the assignment deed.
  4. Rights Assigned: The specific rights being assigned must be mentioned (e.g., reproduction rights, distribution rights, performance rights).
  5. Territory: The geographical extent of the assignment must be stated (e.g., India, Asia, Worldwide).
  6. Duration: The term or period of the assignment must be clearly mentioned.
  7. Royalty: The amount of royalty payable and the mode of payment must be specified (e.g., ₹50,000 annually, 10% of net sales).

Non-compliance with any of these requirements renders the assignment invalid. Courts have held that substantial compliance is not sufficient; strict compliance is mandatory.

Answer:

Assignment and license are two distinct mechanisms for transferring or granting copyright rights:

Basis Assignment License
Nature Transfer of ownership of rights Permission to use without transfer of ownership
Effect Assignee becomes the owner of assigned rights Licensee only gets permission to exercise certain rights
Formalities Must comply with Section 19 (written, signed, etc.) Can be oral or written; less formal requirements
Duration Can be for entire copyright term Usually for limited period
Revocability Generally irrevocable (except for breach) Can be revocable or irrevocable
Right to Sue Assignee can sue infringers independently Usually licensor retains right to sue; exclusive licensee may sue
Further Grant Assignee can further assign (unless restricted) Licensee usually cannot sub-license (unless permitted)

Answer:

In Indian Performing Rights Society v. Sanjay Dalia (2015) 10 SCC 161, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment that fundamentally changed the understanding of copyright ownership in film music.

Key Holdings:

  • The Supreme Court held that the film producer is the first owner of copyright in cinematograph films, including the music incorporated in the film.
  • Music composers and lyricists do not own the copyright in film music; they are deemed to have created the music under a contract of service with the producer.
  • Consequently, music composers cannot assign or transfer rights in film music to third parties like IPRS because they never owned these rights in the first place.
  • Assignment by a non-owner is void ab initio (invalid from the beginning) and has no legal effect.

Impact on Copyright Assignment:

  • The case established the fundamental principle that only a copyright owner can assign rights. An assignment by someone who doesn't own the copyright is legally invalid.
  • It affected thousands of music assignments worth hundreds of crores of rupees that IPRS had claimed through assignments from composers.
  • The judgment clarified that before accepting an assignment, the assignee must verify that the assignor actually owns the copyright being assigned.
  • It led to restructuring of royalty collection and distribution systems in the Indian music industry.
  • The case emphasized the importance of Section 17 of the Copyright Act which determines first ownership of copyright.

Answer:

No, moral rights cannot be assigned or transferred under Indian copyright law. They remain with the author/creator even after assignment of economic rights.

Nature of Moral Rights:

  • Moral rights are personal rights that protect the personality and reputation of the creator.
  • They include the right of paternity (right to claim authorship) and the right of integrity (right to prevent distortion or mutilation of the work).
  • These rights are independent of economic/exploitation rights.
  • Section 57 of the Copyright Act provides for moral rights which are inalienable.

Case Law: Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India (2005) 30 PTC 253:

  • Facts: Renowned sculptor Amar Nath Sehgal created a bronze mural for Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi. The government relocated the artwork and stored it improperly in a storeroom for years without the artist's knowledge.
  • Issue: Whether the government's action violated the artist's moral rights even though economic rights may have been transferred.
  • Held: The Delhi High Court held that moral rights are distinct from economic rights and cannot be assigned. The Court recognized that:
    • Assignment of economic rights does not affect moral rights.
    • The artist retains the right to protect the integrity of the work.
    • Improper treatment causing damage to the artwork violates the right of integrity.
    • The government's action of storing the mural in poor conditions violated the artist's moral rights.
  • Remedy: The Court awarded ₹5 lakhs as compensation to the artist for violation of moral rights.

Conclusion: This case firmly established that moral rights are inalienable personal rights that remain with the creator regardless of any assignment of economic rights. Authors can always enforce their moral rights to prevent distortion, mutilation, or other actions that harm their reputation.

Answer:

The digital revolution has created numerous challenges for traditional copyright assignment frameworks:

Key Challenges:

1. Digital Rights Management:

  • Challenge: Digital content can be easily copied and distributed globally, making territorial assignments ineffective. Traditional assignment deeds don't address digital exploitation rights adequately.
  • Impact: Rights worth crores of rupees are difficult to enforce in the digital environment.

2. Streaming and Cloud Services:

  • Challenge: Platforms like Netflix, Spotify, Amazon Prime create new forms of exploitation not covered in traditional assignments. Revenue sharing models are complex with pay-per-stream calculations.
  • Impact: Creators often receive minimal royalties (₹0.001-0.01 per stream) due to unclear assignment terms.

3. Cross-Border Issues:

  • Challenge: Digital distribution is global, but copyright is territorial. Different countries have different assignment requirements and enforcement mechanisms.
  • Impact: Legal uncertainty and high enforcement costs (₹10-50 lakhs for international litigation).

4. AI and Machine Learning:

  • Challenge: Ownership of AI-generated works is unclear. Can such works be assigned? Who owns copyright when AI creates content?
  • Impact: Legal vacuum regarding billions of rupees worth of AI-generated content.

5. NFTs and Blockchain:

  • Challenge: Does sale of an NFT constitute assignment of copyright or just license? Smart contracts may conflict with traditional assignment requirements.
  • Impact: NFT sales worth crores but unclear copyright ownership.

6. Social Media Platforms:

  • Challenge: Platform terms of service often include implied assignments. Users unknowingly transfer rights when uploading content.
  • Impact: Creators lose control over viral content worth significant money.

Suggested Solutions:

  1. Comprehensive Assignment Agreements:
    • Draft assignments that specifically address digital rights, streaming, cloud storage, social media, etc.
    • Include clauses for future technologies ("future-proofing" provisions).
  2. Blockchain-Based Solutions:
    • Implement smart contracts for automatic royalty distribution.
    • Use blockchain for transparent tracking of content usage and payments.
    • Create immutable records of assignments and ownership transfers.
  3. Minimum Royalty Standards:
    • Establish minimum guaranteed royalties (e.g., ₹25,000 annually) in digital assignments.
    • Ensure fair compensation in streaming models based on actual usage.
  4. Reversion Clauses:
    • Include automatic reversion if work not exploited within 2-3 years.
    • Provide for periodic review and renegotiation of digital rights.
  5. Legislative Amendments:
    • Update Copyright Act to specifically address digital assignments.
    • Clarify ownership and assignment of AI-generated works.
    • Provide for NFT-related copyright transfers.
  6. Creator Education:
    • Awareness programs about digital rights and assignment implications.
    • Legal aid for creators to understand platform terms and conditions.
  7. International Coordination:
    • Work towards harmonization of copyright assignment laws globally.
    • Develop international enforcement mechanisms for digital rights.

Conclusion: The digital age requires a fundamental rethinking of copyright assignment frameworks. While traditional principles remain valid, their application must be adapted to new technologies and business models to ensure fair treatment of creators and legal certainty for assignees.

Answer:

Copyright assignment can take various forms depending on the scope, duration, and conditions of the transfer:

1. Complete (Total) Assignment:

  • Definition: Transfer of all rights in the copyright for the entire copyright term across all territories.
  • Effect: Assignee gets complete ownership; assignor retains no exploitation rights.
  • Example: A novelist assigns all rights in a book to a publisher for the entire copyright period (60 years after author's death) for worldwide exploitation. The publisher can print, distribute, create translations, make films, etc. Consideration: ₹10 lakhs as advance plus 15% royalty on sales.

2. Partial Assignment:

  • Definition: Transfer of only some rights while retaining others.
  • Types of Partial Assignment:
    • Right-Based: A music composer assigns only the reproduction and distribution rights for a song but retains performing and broadcasting rights.
    • Territory-Based: An author assigns Indian rights to one publisher (₹5 lakhs) and US rights to another publisher ($10,000).
    • Time-Based: Film producer assigns satellite rights for 5 years (₹2 crores), after which rights revert.
    • Medium-Based: Author assigns print rights to Publisher A and digital/e-book rights to Publisher B.

3. Conditional Assignment:

  • Definition: Assignment that becomes effective only upon fulfillment of specified conditions.
  • Examples:
    • Assignment effective upon payment of ₹5 lakhs consideration.
    • Assignment subject to book selling minimum 10,000 copies within 2 years.
    • Assignment with reversion clause if work not published within 18 months.
    • Assignment conditional on obtaining censor certificate for film.

4. Assignment of Future Works:

  • Definition: Assignment of copyright in works not yet created.
  • Legal Basis: Section 18 specifically allows such assignments.
  • Examples:
    • Publishing contract where author assigns rights to next three novels (not yet written) for ₹15 lakhs total.
    • Employment agreement where software developer assigns all future code created during employment.
    • Commissioned artwork where painter assigns copyright in portrait before creating it (advance ₹2 lakhs).

5. Territorial Assignment:

  • Single Country: Rights for India only (₹3 lakhs).
  • Regional: Rights for South Asian countries (₹7 lakhs).
  • Continental: Rights for Asia (₹15 lakhs).
  • Worldwide: Global rights (₹50 lakhs).
  • Example: A filmmaker assigns theatrical rights for India to Distributor A (₹10 crores), Middle East rights to Distributor B ($500,000), and North America rights to Distributor C ($1 million).

Conclusion: The type of assignment chosen depends on the nature of the work, commercial considerations, and the bargaining power of the parties. Creators should carefully consider which rights to assign and retain others for future exploitation and additional revenue streams.

© 2024 Project on Assignment of Copyright | Haldia Law College | All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top