THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957
CHAPTER IV: Ownership of Copyright and the Rights of the Owner
Sections 17 to 21 | Comprehensive Educational Guide
Introduction to Chapter IV
Understanding Ownership and Rights in Copyright Law
What This Chapter Covers
- Section 17: Who becomes the first owner of a copyright when something creative is made
- Section 18: How copyright can be given (assigned) to someone else
- Section 19: The proper way to make an assignment valid and legal
- Section 19A: What happens when there is a dispute about assignment
- Section 20: How copyright passes through a will when the author dies
- Section 21: How an author can give up (relinquish) their copyright
Section 17: First Owner of Copyright
Who Gets the Copyright When a Work is Created?
Simple Explanation
Section 17 answers the most basic question: "When I create something, who owns the copyright?" The general rule is simple - the person who creates the work is the first owner. But there are important exceptions, especially when you create something as part of your job or when someone pays you to create it.
The General Rule
The author of a work is the first owner of copyright. This means if you write a poem, paint a picture, or compose a song on your own time and with your own resources, you automatically own the copyright. No registration is needed - the copyright exists the moment you create the work.
Key Exceptions to the General Rule
-
Works Made During Employment (Section 17(c)): If you create something as part of your job duties, your employer owns the copyright, not you. This is called "work for hire."
- Example: A journalist writing articles for a newspaper - the newspaper owns the copyright
- The employment must be a "contract of service" (regular job), not "contract for service" (freelance)
-
Commissioned Works (Section 17(b) & (c)): When someone pays you to take their photograph, paint their portrait, or create an engraving, the person who paid for it becomes the first owner
- This applies to photographs, portraits, engravings, and cinematograph films
- Example: Wedding photographer - the couple who paid owns the photos
- Government Works (Section 17(d)): Works created under the direction or control of the Government are owned by the Government
- Public Speeches (Section 17(cc)): The speaker owns copyright in their speech, but the person who arranged the delivery owns the collection if speeches are published together
- International Organizations (Section 17(dd)): Works made under direction of international organizations are owned by those organizations
Important Note: Contrary Agreement
All these rules can be changed by a written agreement between the parties. So if an employer agrees in writing that the employee will keep the copyright, that agreement will be valid. The phrase used in law is "in the absence of any agreement to the contrary."
Practical Example
Scenario: Ramesh works as a software developer at ABC Tech Company. During office hours, using company resources, he develops a new mobile application.
Question: Who owns the copyright in the application?
Answer: ABC Tech Company owns the copyright because:
- Ramesh created it during the course of his employment
- It was created as part of his job duties
- He used company time and resources
However: If Ramesh had a written contract saying he would retain copyright in his creations, then Ramesh would own it.
Landmark Case Law
Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern Indian Motion Pictures Association
AIR 1977 SC 1443 | (1977) 2 SCC 820
Facts: The question arose whether a music composer who creates music for a film retains copyright or whether the film producer becomes the owner.
Held: The Supreme Court held that when a composer is commissioned to create music for a film, the film producer becomes the first owner of the copyright in the musical work as incorporated in the cinematograph film, unless there is a contract to the contrary. However, the composer retains copyright for separate exploitation of the music outside the film.
Significance: This case clarified the ownership of copyright in commissioned works, particularly in the film industry, and established that the relationship between parties and the nature of engagement determines ownership.
| Situation | First Owner | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Author creates work independently | Author | Section 17 (General Rule) |
| Work created during employment | Employer | Section 17(c) |
| Commissioned photograph/portrait | Person who commissioned | Section 17(b) |
| Commissioned engraving | Person who commissioned | Section 17(c) |
| Government work | Government | Section 17(d) |
| Public speech/lecture | Speaker (for speech itself) | Section 17(cc) |
| Work for international organization | International Organization | Section 17(dd) |
Section 18: Assignment of Copyright
How Copyright Can Be Transferred to Others
Simple Explanation
Section 18 explains that the owner of copyright can transfer (assign) their copyright to another person. It's like selling or gifting property - the owner can give away their rights completely or partially. The new owner then gets all the rights that the original owner had.
Key Points About Assignment
- Who Can Assign: The owner of the copyright (which includes the first owner or anyone who has legally acquired the copyright)
-
What Can Be Assigned:
- The entire copyright (all rights)
- Part of the copyright (specific rights only)
- Rights for the whole term or part of the term
- Rights for whole of India or specific territory
- Future Works: Assignment of copyright in a work that has not yet been created (future work) is also possible, but it will take effect only when the work comes into existence
-
Existing Works vs. Future Works:
- Existing work: Assignment is effective immediately
- Future work: Assignment becomes effective when work is created
Types of Assignment
- Complete Assignment: All rights transferred permanently - the original owner retains nothing
- Partial Assignment: Only some rights transferred (e.g., only translation rights or only film adaptation rights)
- Limited Assignment: Rights transferred for limited time or limited territory
Assignment vs. License
It's important to understand the difference: Assignment means transferring ownership (like selling a house), while License means giving permission to use (like renting a house). In assignment, the assignee becomes the new owner. In license, the licensor remains the owner but allows someone to use the work.
Practical Example
Scenario: Priya writes a novel. She wants to grant rights to different parties:
- She assigns English publication rights to Publisher A for 5 years
- She assigns Hindi translation rights to Publisher B permanently
- She assigns film adaptation rights to Production House C
- She retains all other rights (audiobook, merchandise, etc.)
Result: This is valid partial and limited assignment. Each party gets only specific rights, and Priya retains rights she didn't assign. After 5 years, English publication rights return to Priya.
Landmark Case Law
Saregama India Ltd. v. Suresh Jindal
(2006) 33 PTC 228 (Cal) | 2007 (34) PTC 522
Facts: The dispute involved the assignment of copyright in musical works and sound recordings. The question was about the validity and scope of assignment agreements.
Held: The Court held that assignment of copyright must be clear and specific about what rights are being transferred. An assignment cannot be implied; it must be express. The assignee only gets rights that are specifically mentioned in the assignment deed.
Significance: This case emphasized that assignment agreements must be carefully drafted with clear terms about which rights are being transferred, for what duration, and for what territory.
| Aspect | Assignment | License |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Transfer of ownership | Permission to use |
| Rights of original owner | Lost (for assigned rights) | Retained |
| Right to sue for infringement | Assignee can sue | Only exclusive licensee can sue |
| Further transfer | Assignee can further assign | Licensee cannot sub-license (unless authorized) |
| Formality required | Must be in writing and signed | Can be oral (except exclusive license) |
Section 19: Mode of Assignment
The Legal Requirements for a Valid Assignment
Simple Explanation
Section 19 tells us how an assignment must be done to be legally valid. Just saying "I give you my copyright" is not enough. The law requires certain formalities to protect both the author and the person receiving the rights. Think of it like selling land - you need a proper deed, not just a handshake.
Mandatory Requirements for Valid Assignment
- Writing Requirement (Section 19(1)): The assignment must be in writing. Oral assignments are not valid.
- Signature Requirement (Section 19(1)): The assignment must be signed by the assignor (the person giving the rights) or by their duly authorized agent.
- Identification of Work (Section 19(2)): The assignment must clearly identify the specific work being assigned.
-
Specification of Rights (Section 19(3)): The assignment must specify:
- Which rights are being assigned
- The duration of the assignment
- The territorial extent (e.g., India only, or worldwide)
- Royalty and Consideration (Section 19(4)): The assignment must specify the amount of royalty payable to the author, and may also include any advance payment.
Default Rules When Terms Are Not Specified
- Duration not specified: Assignment is deemed to be for 5 years from the date of assignment
- Territory not specified: Assignment is deemed to extend to the whole of India
Special Protection: Reversion of Rights (Section 19(4))
If the assignee (person who received the rights) does not exercise the assigned rights within one year from the date of assignment, or from the date the work is created (for future works), then the assignment is automatically cancelled. The copyright reverts back to the original author. This protects authors from people who acquire rights but then sit on them.
Dispute Resolution (Section 19(5)-(10))
If there is a dispute about the assignment, the Copyright Board (now replaced by Commercial Courts/Appellate Board) has jurisdiction to decide. The author can also complain if royalty is not being paid or if the terms are being violated.
Practical Example - Valid Assignment Deed
A properly drafted assignment should contain:
- Parties: "This Assignment Deed is made between Mr. Rajesh Kumar (Author/Assignor) and XYZ Publications Pvt. Ltd. (Assignee)"
- Work Identification: "The literary work titled 'Adventures in Delhi' written by the Assignor"
- Rights Assigned: "The right to print, publish, and sell the said work in English language"
- Duration: "For a period of 7 years from the date of this deed"
- Territory: "In the territory of India and Bangladesh"
- Consideration: "Rs. 2,00,000 as advance and 10% royalty on net sales"
- Signature: "Signed by the Assignor on [date]"
Landmark Case Law
R.G. Anand v. M/s. Delux Films
AIR 1978 SC 1613 | (1978) 4 SCC 118
Facts: R.G. Anand wrote a play called "Hum Hindustani". The question arose whether the copyright in the play was validly assigned to the film producers for making the film "New Delhi".
Held: The Supreme Court examined the requirements for valid assignment and held that any assignment must clearly specify the rights being transferred. The Court also discussed the test for copyright infringement and the difference between idea and expression.
Significance: This landmark judgment established that assignments must be specific and clear. It also clarified that ideas cannot be copyrighted - only the particular expression of ideas can be protected.
| Requirement | Details | Consequence if Missing |
|---|---|---|
| In Writing | Must be a written document | Assignment is void/invalid |
| Signed by Assignor | Original signature or authorized agent | Assignment is void/invalid |
| Work Identification | Clear description of the work | Assignment may be challenged |
| Rights Specified | Which specific rights are transferred | Ambiguity may favor author |
| Duration | Period for which rights are assigned | Deemed to be 5 years |
| Territory | Geographic area for the rights | Deemed to be whole of India |
| Royalty | Payment terms for the author | Can lead to disputes |
Section 19A: Disputes with Respect to Assignment of Copyright
Resolving Conflicts in Copyright Assignments
Simple Explanation
Section 19A was added to provide a mechanism for resolving disputes that arise from copyright assignments. Sometimes authors and assignees disagree about royalty payments, exercise of rights, or interpretation of the assignment terms. This section provides a way to resolve such disputes.
When This Section Applies
- Non-payment of royalty: When the assignee fails to pay the agreed royalty to the author
- Non-exercise of rights: When the assignee does not exercise the assigned rights (e.g., book not published)
- Disputes about terms: Disagreements about interpretation of assignment terms
- Breach of conditions: When either party violates the conditions of assignment
Forum for Dispute Resolution
Originally, the Copyright Board had jurisdiction over such disputes. After the abolition of the Copyright Board in 2017, disputes are now handled by the Commercial Courts or the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB). With IPAB also being abolished in 2021, these matters now go to High Courts with commercial jurisdiction.
Remedies Available
- Revocation of Assignment: The assignment can be cancelled and rights can revert to the author
- Payment of dues: Order for payment of outstanding royalties
- Compensation: Damages for breach of assignment terms
- Specific Performance: Order to fulfill the terms of the assignment
Author-Protective Provisions
Section 19A generally favors authors because they are usually in a weaker bargaining position. The law recognizes that publishers, film producers, and other commercial entities often have more negotiating power, so it provides special protection to authors.
Practical Example
Scenario: Author Meena assigned publication rights for her cookbook to ABC Publishers for 7 years with 8% royalty on sales. After 3 years:
- The publisher sold 50,000 copies but paid royalty for only 30,000
- The publisher did not provide sales statements as agreed
- The publisher also licensed digital rights to a third party (which was not part of the assignment)
Meena's Options under Section 19A:
- File a complaint for recovery of unpaid royalties
- Seek revocation of assignment due to breach
- Claim damages for unauthorized licensing of digital rights
- Request an audit of the publisher's sales records
Landmark Case Law
Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Performing Right Society
(2011) 47 PTC 587 (Bom) | 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 317
Facts: This case involved disputes about the assignment of performing rights in musical works and the role of collecting societies. Questions arose about the validity of assignments and the rights of assignees.
Held: The Bombay High Court examined the nature of copyright assignments and held that disputes must be resolved by looking at the specific terms of the assignment. The Court emphasized the importance of clear documentation and the rights of authors to fair compensation.
Significance: This case highlighted the importance of Section 19A in protecting authors' rights and ensuring that assignees fulfill their obligations. It also discussed the role of copyright societies in managing collective rights.
| Type of Dispute | Grounds | Possible Remedy |
|---|---|---|
| Non-payment | Royalty not paid as agreed | Recovery of dues + revocation |
| Non-exercise | Rights not used within 1 year | Automatic reversion to author |
| Unauthorized use | Rights exceeded by assignee | Injunction + damages |
| Breach of terms | Contract conditions violated | Specific performance/damages |
| Non-disclosure | Sales records not shared | Audit order + penalty |
Section 20: Transmission of Copyright in Manuscript by Testamentary Disposition
What Happens to Unpublished Works When the Author Dies
Simple Explanation
Section 20 deals with a special situation: what happens to an author's unpublished manuscript when the author dies? If an author bequeaths (gives through a will) the original manuscript to someone, does the copyright also go to that person, or do they only get the physical paper? This section answers that question.
The Rule
When an author dies and leaves their unpublished manuscript to someone through a will, the person who receives the manuscript is presumed to also receive the copyright in that work. This means:
- The bequest of the manuscript = bequest of copyright (unless the will says otherwise)
- This applies only to unpublished works - not to published works
- This applies only when the author owns the manuscript at the time of death
Key Conditions
- Work must be unpublished: This section only applies if the work was not published during the author's lifetime
- Bequest must be specific: The manuscript must be specifically mentioned in the will
- Author must own it: The author must have been the owner of the manuscript at death
- Rebuttable presumption: This is a presumption that can be overridden if the will specifically says that only the physical manuscript (not the copyright) is being given
Why This Section Exists
Without this section, there would be confusion. Imagine an author dies leaving an unpublished novel to her daughter. Does the daughter get just the stack of papers, or can she publish the book? Section 20 clarifies that the recipient gets both the physical manuscript and the right to publish it, unless the will specifically separates them.
Practical Example
Scenario 1: Famous poet Kalidasa (not the ancient one!) dies leaving a will that says: "I give my unpublished poetry collection 'Moonlight Dreams' to my nephew Rahul."
Result: Rahul gets both the physical manuscript AND the copyright. He can publish the poetry and earn royalties from it.
Scenario 2: Same situation, but the will says: "I give my unpublished poetry collection to Rahul, but the copyright shall go to my daughter Priya."
Result: Rahul gets the physical papers, but Priya gets the copyright. Only Priya can decide to publish it.
Landmark Case Law
Pushpanath Krishnamurthy v. State of Tamil Nadu
(2012) 5 MLJ 553 | MANU/TN/3042/2012
Facts: A dispute arose regarding the transmission of copyright in unpublished manuscripts of a deceased author. The question was whether the bequest of manuscripts in the will automatically included the copyright.
Held: The Court applied Section 20 and held that when a manuscript is bequeathed without specific exclusion of copyright, the legatee (person receiving through will) is entitled to both the physical manuscript and the copyright. The presumption under Section 20 operates unless there is contrary intention in the will.
Significance: This case reinforced the interpretation of Section 20 and established that authors should be clear in their wills if they want to separate the physical manuscript from the copyright.
| Scenario | Physical Manuscript Goes To | Copyright Goes To |
|---|---|---|
| Will bequeaths manuscript only (Section 20 applies) | Named legatee | Same legatee (presumption) |
| Will separates manuscript and copyright | Person named for manuscript | Person named for copyright |
| No will (intestate succession) | Legal heirs | Legal heirs |
| Work already published before death | As per will | Section 20 does NOT apply - normal succession |
Section 21: Relinquishment of Copyright
How an Author Can Give Up Their Copyright Voluntarily
Simple Explanation
Section 21 allows an author to voluntarily give up (relinquish) their copyright. This is different from assignment - in assignment, you give your rights to someone else; in relinquishment, you give up your rights so that no one owns them. The work essentially becomes public domain and anyone can use it freely.
Requirements for Valid Relinquishment
- Notice Required: The author must give notice (in the prescribed form) to the Registrar of Copyrights
- Publication: The Registrar publishes the notice in the Official Gazette
- Effect: Upon publication of the notice, the copyright ceases to exist
- Irrevocable: Once relinquished, the author cannot reclaim the copyright
Why Would Someone Relinquish Copyright?
- Promote free access: Authors who want their work to be freely available to everyone (like open-source software creators)
- Educational purposes: Authors who want their educational materials to be used freely
- Religious or philosophical reasons: Authors who believe knowledge should be free
- Public interest: Works created for public benefit that should not be restricted
Effect of Relinquishment
Once copyright is relinquished, the work enters the public domain. This means:
- Anyone can copy, publish, or distribute the work
- Anyone can make derivative works (translations, adaptations)
- No permission or payment is required
- The author loses all economic rights
- However, moral rights (right to be credited as author) may still remain
Difference from Dedication to Public Domain in Other Countries
Unlike in the USA where authors can simply declare a work to be in the public domain, Indian law requires a formal process. The notice to the Registrar and publication in the Gazette are mandatory steps.
Practical Example
Scenario: Dr. Sharma, a retired professor, has written a comprehensive textbook on Physics. He wants students everywhere to use it freely without paying. He decides to relinquish his copyright.
Steps Dr. Sharma must follow:
- Prepare a notice in prescribed Form XIV (as per Copyright Rules)
- Send the notice to the Registrar of Copyrights, New Delhi
- Wait for the Registrar to publish the notice in the Official Gazette
- After publication, the textbook is in public domain
Result: Anyone can now print, sell, translate, or adapt Dr. Sharma's textbook without his permission. But they should still give him credit as the author (moral right).
Relevant Case Law
Tech Plus Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Jyoti Janda
(2014) 60 PTC 121 (Del)
Facts: This case involved questions about the abandonment and relinquishment of copyright, and whether informal abandonment without following Section 21 procedure is valid.
Held: The Delhi High Court clarified that relinquishment of copyright under Indian law requires compliance with Section 21. Mere non-enforcement or informal statements of abandonment do not constitute valid relinquishment. The formal procedure of notice to the Registrar must be followed.
Significance: This case established that authors cannot casually give up their copyright - the formal procedure under Section 21 is mandatory for valid relinquishment under Indian law.
| Aspect | Relinquishment | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
| To whom rights go | No one (public domain) | Specific assignee |
| Formality | Notice to Registrar + Gazette publication | Written and signed deed |
| Can be revoked? | No - permanent | Yes, in some circumstances |
| Consideration/payment | Not required | Usually involves payment |
| Effect on users | Anyone can use freely | Only assignee can use |
Complete Overview Table
Chapter IV at a Glance
| Section | Title | Key Concept | Important Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section 17 | First Owner of Copyright | Determines original ownership | Author is owner; exceptions for employment, commission, government works |
| Section 18 | Assignment of Copyright | Transfer of copyright to others | Can be partial/complete; future works can be assigned |
| Section 19 | Mode of Assignment | Formal requirements for assignment | Must be written, signed, specify rights, duration, territory, royalty |
| Section 19A | Disputes in Assignment | Resolution of assignment disputes | Courts can revoke assignment; protects author's interests |
| Section 20 | Transmission by Will | Inheritance of unpublished manuscripts | Bequest of manuscript = bequest of copyright (presumption) |
| Section 21 | Relinquishment | Voluntary surrender of copyright | Notice to Registrar required; work enters public domain |
Flowchart: Copyright Ownership and Transfer Process
Visual Guide to Chapter IV
A Work is Created
Created during employment?
Employer is First Owner
(Section 17(c))
Continue to next question
Commissioned work (photo/portrait)?
Person who commissioned
is First Owner (Section 17(b))
Author is First Owner
(Section 17 - General Rule)
What can the owner do?
Keep Copyright
(Retain all rights)
Assign Copyright
(Section 18-19)
License Rights
(Chapter VI)
Relinquish
(Section 21)
Follow Section 19 Requirements
(Section 19A)
Approach Court
Seek remedy/revocation
Assignment valid
Assignee becomes new owner
Copyright Ownership Determined
Mind Map: Chapter IV Structure
Visual Overview of Copyright Ownership Concepts
Roadmap: Journey Through Chapter IV
Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding Copyright Ownership
Step 1: Understand First Ownership (Section 17)
Begin by understanding who becomes the first owner when a work is created. The general rule is that the author is the first owner, but important exceptions apply for employment relationships, commissioned works, and government works. Always check if any exception applies before assuming the author owns the copyright.
Key Question: "Who created this work and under what circumstances?"
Step 2: Learn About Assignment (Section 18)
Once you know who owns the copyright, understand how it can be transferred. Copyright can be assigned wholly or partially, for the entire term or limited period, and for all of India or specific territories. Remember that assignment is different from license - assignment transfers ownership while license only grants permission.
Key Question: "What rights are being transferred and to what extent?"
Step 3: Master Assignment Formalities (Section 19)
Know the mandatory requirements for a valid assignment: it must be in writing, signed by the assignor, identify the work, specify the rights being assigned, state the duration and territory, and mention royalty terms. If duration is not specified, it defaults to 5 years; if territory is not specified, it defaults to whole of India.
Key Question: "Does this assignment document meet all legal requirements?"
Step 4: Know Dispute Resolution (Section 19A)
Understand what happens when things go wrong. If the assignee doesn't pay royalty, doesn't exercise rights within one year, or violates assignment terms, the author can seek remedies. The copyright may revert to the author, or damages may be awarded. Courts have jurisdiction to resolve such disputes.
Key Question: "Are the terms of assignment being honored?"
Step 5: Understand Testamentary Transmission (Section 20)
Know what happens to copyright when an author dies. For unpublished manuscripts, if the will bequeaths the manuscript to someone, the copyright is presumed to go with it unless the will specifically separates them. This only applies to unpublished works.
Key Question: "What does the author's will say about their manuscripts?"
Step 6: Learn About Relinquishment (Section 21)
Finally, understand that authors can voluntarily give up their copyright. This requires formal notice to the Registrar of Copyrights and publication in the Official Gazette. Once relinquished, the work enters the public domain and cannot be reclaimed.
Key Question: "Does the author want to dedicate this work to the public?"
Congratulations! Chapter IV Mastered
You now understand the complete framework of copyright ownership in India. Remember these key principles:
- Author is generally the first owner, with important exceptions
- Copyright can be assigned wholly or partially with proper documentation
- Assignment requires specific formalities to be valid
- Disputes can be resolved through courts with author-protective remedies
- Unpublished manuscripts and copyright can be inherited through wills
- Authors can voluntarily relinquish copyright to public domain
