ICDS II - VALUATION OF INVENTORIES
This resource is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
1. INTRODUCTION TO ICDS II
What is ICDS II?
- Full Name: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards - II (Valuation of Inventories)
- Notification Date: 31st March 2015
- Applicable From: Assessment Year 2016-17 onwards
- Legal Basis: Section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Purpose: To bring uniformity in computation of income and to avoid controversies in tax assessments
Why ICDS II was Introduced?
- Remove Subjectivity: Eliminate subjective treatment in inventory valuation
- Standardization: Create uniform standards across all taxpayers
- Prevent Revenue Leakage: Reduce tax avoidance through inventory manipulation
- Align with International Practices: Bring Indian tax system closer to global standards
- Reduce Litigation: Minimize disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities
2. SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY
2.1 Who Must Follow ICDS II?
- All Taxpayers: Computing income under the head "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" or "Income from Other Sources"
- Companies: All companies irrespective of turnover
- Non-Corporate Entities: Following mercantile system of accounting
- Traders and Manufacturers: Dealing with goods and raw materials
2.2 Exemptions (Who Need NOT Follow)
- Individual/HUF: Computing income on cash basis
- Presumptive Taxation: Taxpayers under Section 44AD, 44ADA, 44AE, 44BB, 44BBB
- Special Income: Income from speculative business treated separately
- Small Taxpayers: Turnover below threshold opting for cash system
2.3 Types of Inventories Covered
| Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Materials held for use in production | Cotton, Steel, Chemicals, Wood |
| Work-in-Progress (WIP) | Partially completed goods | Semi-finished products in factory |
| Finished Goods | Completed products ready for sale | Garments, Furniture, Electronics |
| Stock-in-Trade | Goods purchased for resale | Retail inventory, Trading goods |
| Consumable Stores | Items consumed in production | Lubricants, Spare parts, Tools |
| Loose Tools | Small tools used in manufacturing | Hammers, Spanners, Drills |
3. KEY DEFINITIONS
3.1 Net Realizable Value (NRV)
- Definition: Estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business MINUS estimated costs of completion and estimated costs necessary to make the sale
- Formula: NRV = Estimated Selling Price - Completion Costs - Selling Costs
- Key Point: It represents the net amount that entity expects to realize from sale of inventory
Example 1: Calculating NRV
Scenario: ABC Ltd. has raw materials costing ₹1,00,000
- Estimated selling price of finished goods: ₹1,50,000
- Cost to complete (processing): ₹30,000
- Selling and distribution costs: ₹10,000
Calculation:
NRV = ₹1,50,000 - ₹30,000 - ₹10,000 = ₹1,10,000
Valuation: Lower of Cost (₹1,00,000) or NRV (₹1,10,000) = ₹1,00,000
3.2 Fair Value
- Definition: The amount for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction
- Market-Based: Based on market prices, not entity-specific factors
- Usage in ICDS: NOT used for inventory valuation (unlike AS/Ind AS)
3.3 Cost of Inventories
- Purchase Cost: Invoice price minus trade discounts, rebates and subsidies
- Conversion Costs: Direct labor, direct expenses, and production overheads
- Other Costs: Costs incurred to bring inventories to present location and condition
- Exclusions: Abnormal waste, storage costs, administrative overheads, selling costs
4. VALUATION PRINCIPLES
4.1 Basic Valuation Rule
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE:
Inventories shall be valued at COST or NET REALIZABLE VALUE (NRV), WHICHEVER IS LOWER
4.2 Components of Cost
| Component | Included Items | Excluded Items |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase Costs |
• Invoice price • Import duties • Non-refundable taxes • Transport & handling • Direct costs |
• Trade discounts • Rebates • Duty drawbacks • CENVAT credit • Subsidies |
| Conversion Costs |
• Direct materials • Direct labor • Direct expenses • Variable overheads • Fixed overheads (allocated) |
• Abnormal waste • Storage costs • Administrative OH • Selling & distribution • Finance costs |
| Other Costs |
• Design costs for specific customer • Costs to bring to present location • Costs to bring to present condition |
• Interest & financing • Exchange differences • General design costs |
4.3 Special Considerations
A. By-Products and Scrap
- By-Products: Valued at NRV and deducted from cost of main product
- Scrap: Valued at NRV when measurable
- Treatment: Reduces cost of production of main product
B. Joint Products
- Allocation Method: Costs allocated on rational and consistent basis
- Basis Options: Relative sales value at split-off point or physical quantities
- Consistency: Same method to be followed year after year
C. Standard Costing
- Permitted: For convenience if results approximate actual cost
- Review Required: Standards must be regularly reviewed
- Revision: Update when conditions change significantly
Example 2: Cost Calculation - Manufacturing Entity
XYZ Manufacturing Ltd. - Product Cost Calculation
| Cost Element | Amount (₹) | Include/Exclude |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 50,000 | Include |
| Direct Labor | 30,000 | Include |
| Variable Production Overheads | 15,000 | Include |
| Fixed Production Overheads (Normal Capacity) | 20,000 | Include |
| Abnormal Wastage | 5,000 | Exclude |
| Storage Costs | 3,000 | Exclude |
| Administrative Overheads | 8,000 | Exclude |
| Selling & Distribution | 7,000 | Exclude |
| TOTAL INVENTORY COST | 1,15,000 | Final Cost |
5. COST FORMULA / COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
5.1 Acceptable Methods under ICDS II
Method 1: First-In-First-Out (FIFO)
- Assumption: Items purchased first are sold first
- Valuation: Closing stock valued at most recent purchase prices
- Impact: In rising prices, higher closing stock value, lower COGS, higher profits
- Suitability: Suitable for perishable goods, fashion items
Method 2: Weighted Average Cost (WAC)
- Formula: WAC = Total Cost of Goods Available ÷ Total Units Available
- Application: Calculate average after each purchase (Moving WAC) or periodically
- Impact: Smoothens price fluctuations
- Suitability: Suitable for homogeneous goods, commodities
IMPORTANT EXCLUSION:
LAST-IN-FIRST-OUT (LIFO) method is NOT PERMITTED under ICDS II
5.2 Specific Identification Method
- When Used: For items not ordinarily interchangeable
- Application: Goods segregated for specific projects or produced/purchased for specific customers
- Examples: Customized machinery, special orders, heavy equipment, ships, aircraft
- Requirement: Each item must be specifically identified and traceable
Example 3: FIFO vs Weighted Average Comparison
Transaction Details:
| Date | Transaction | Units | Rate per Unit (₹) | Total (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01-Apr | Opening Stock | 100 | 50 | 5,000 |
| 10-Apr | Purchase | 200 | 55 | 11,000 |
| 20-Apr | Purchase | 150 | 60 | 9,000 |
| 30-Apr | Sales | 300 | - | - |
Closing Stock Calculation:
- Total Units Available: 450 units
- Units Sold: 300 units
- Closing Stock: 150 units
| Method | Calculation | Closing Stock Value |
|---|---|---|
| FIFO Method | 150 units from latest purchase @ ₹60 | ₹9,000 |
| Weighted Average | (5,000 + 11,000 + 9,000) ÷ 450 = ₹55.56 150 units × ₹55.56 |
₹8,334 |
Impact on Taxable Income:
Higher closing stock under FIFO (₹9,000) means lower COGS and higher taxable profit compared to WAC (₹8,334)
6. COMPARISON: ICDS II vs AS 2 vs IND AS 2
| Aspect | ICDS II | AS 2 | Ind AS 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Tax computation | Financial reporting | Financial reporting (converged with IFRS) |
| LIFO Method | NOT Allowed | Allowed | NOT Allowed |
| Interest Cost | Excluded from inventory cost | Included if qualifying conditions met | Included as per Ind AS 23 |
| Exchange Differences | NOT included in inventory cost | May be included in certain cases | Generally NOT included |
| MTM for Commodity Traders | NOT allowed | Allowed at NRV | Allowed at fair value less costs to sell |
| Agricultural Produce | At lower of cost or NRV | At NRV at harvest | At fair value less costs to sell |
| Write-down Reversal | NOT allowed | Allowed | Allowed (to extent of original write-down) |
| Subsidy/Duty Drawback | Reduced from purchase cost | May be reduced or treated as income | Treated as government grant |
Key Differences - Detailed Analysis
1. Treatment of Interest Cost
- ICDS II: Interest cost specifically excluded - reduces inventory cost for tax purposes
- AS 2/Ind AS 2: Can be capitalized if qualifying asset and conditions met - increases financial reporting inventory
- Tax Impact: Creates timing difference between book profit and taxable profit
2. Mark-to-Market for Commodity Brokers
- ICDS II: Commodity brokers CANNOT use MTM - must value at cost or NRV
- AS 2: Allows MTM at NRV for commodity brokers-traders
- Practical Issue: Creates significant book-tax difference for commodity traders
3. Write-down and Reversal
- ICDS II: Once written down, NO reversal allowed even if circumstances change
- AS/Ind AS: Reversal permitted when conditions improve (not exceeding original cost)
- Conservative Approach: ICDS follows more conservative approach for tax purposes
Example 4: Book-Tax Differences
PQR Ltd. - Manufacturing Company
| Item | As per Books (AS 2) | As per Tax (ICDS II) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Material Cost | ₹10,00,000 | ₹10,00,000 | - |
| Conversion Cost | ₹5,00,000 | ₹5,00,000 | - |
| Interest Capitalized | ₹50,000 | ₹0 | ₹50,000 |
| Exchange Difference | ₹30,000 | ₹0 | ₹30,000 |
| Total Inventory Value | ₹15,80,000 | ₹15,00,000 | ₹80,000 |
Tax Implication: Lower inventory value under ICDS II leads to higher COGS and lower taxable income in current year
7. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES
Example 5: Trading Business - Inventory Valuation
ABC Traders Ltd.
Purchases during the year:
| Date | Quantity | Rate per Unit | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 1,000 units | ₹100 | ₹1,00,000 |
| Mar 2024 | 1,500 units | ₹110 | ₹1,65,000 |
| Jun 2024 | 2,000 units | ₹120 | ₹2,40,000 |
Sales: 3,500 units
Closing Stock: 1,000 units
Current Market Price: ₹125 per unit
Estimated Selling Expenses: ₹5 per unit
Solution:
NRV Calculation: ₹125 - ₹5 = ₹120 per unit
Under FIFO Method:
Closing stock valued at latest purchase = 1,000 units @ ₹120 = ₹1,20,000
Valuation: Lower of Cost (₹1,20,000) or NRV (₹1,20,000) = ₹1,20,000
Example 6: Manufacturing - WIP Valuation
DEF Manufacturing Ltd.
Work-in-Progress as on 31st March:
| Cost Element | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|
| Direct Materials | 2,50,000 |
| Direct Labor | 1,50,000 |
| Variable Production OH (allocated) | 75,000 |
| Fixed Production OH (allocated at normal capacity) | 1,00,000 |
| Administrative Overheads | 50,000 |
| Interest on Working Capital | 25,000 |
Solution - WIP Valuation under ICDS II:
| Cost Element | Amount (₹) | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Materials | 2,50,000 | ✓ Include |
| Direct Labor | 1,50,000 | ✓ Include |
| Variable Production OH | 75,000 | ✓ Include |
| Fixed Production OH | 1,00,000 | ✓ Include |
| Administrative OH | - | ✗ Exclude |
| Interest Cost | - | ✗ Exclude |
| WIP Value | 5,75,000 | Final Value |
Example 7: By-Products and Joint Products
GHI Industries - Chemical Manufacturing
Scenario: Joint process produces two products
- Total Joint Cost up to split-off point: ₹5,00,000
- Product A: 600 units, Selling price ₹500 per unit = ₹3,00,000
- Product B: 400 units, Selling price ₹500 per unit = ₹2,00,000
- By-product: Scrap valued at ₹20,000
Solution - Cost Allocation:
Step 1: Deduct by-product value from joint cost
Net Joint Cost = ₹5,00,000 - ₹20,000 = ₹4,80,000
Step 2: Allocate based on relative sales value
| Product | Sales Value | Ratio | Allocated Cost | Cost per Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product A | ₹3,00,000 | 60% | ₹2,88,000 | ₹480 |
| Product B | ₹2,00,000 | 40% | ₹1,92,000 | ₹480 |
| Total | ₹5,00,000 | 100% | ₹4,80,000 | - |
Example 8: NRV Less Than Cost - Write Down
JKL Ltd. - Electronics Trading
Situation: Technological obsolescence
| Particulars | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|
| Historical Cost of Inventory | 8,00,000 |
| Current Market Price (per unit) | 80% of cost |
| Estimated Selling Price | 6,40,000 |
| Estimated Selling Expenses | 40,000 |
Solution:
NRV Calculation:
NRV = Estimated Selling Price - Selling Expenses
NRV = ₹6,40,000 - ₹40,000 = ₹6,00,000
Valuation:
Lower of Cost (₹8,00,000) or NRV (₹6,00,000) = ₹6,00,000
Write-down Required: ₹8,00,000 - ₹6,00,000 = ₹2,00,000
Important: Under ICDS II, if next year circumstances improve and NRV increases, NO reversal of this write-down is permitted!
8. IMPORTANT CASE LAWS AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS
8.1 Landmark Cases Related to Inventory Valuation
Case 1: CIT vs. British Paints India Ltd. [1991] 188 ITR 44 (SC)
- Issue: Whether inventory should be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower
- Held by Supreme Court: For income tax purposes, inventory must be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower
- Principle Established: The "cost or market value, whichever is lower" rule is fundamental for tax computation
- Relevance to ICDS II: ICDS II codifies this principle by mandating lower of cost or NRV
- Key Quote: "The valuation of stock-in-trade at cost or market value whichever is lower has to be followed as a general rule"
Case 2: CIT vs. Shahzada Nand & Sons [1966] 60 ITR 392 (SC)
- Issue: Method of valuation - FIFO vs LIFO vs Average
- Held by Supreme Court: Any recognized accounting method consistently followed should be accepted
- Principle Established: Consistency in valuation method is crucial
- Relevance to ICDS II: ICDS II restricts methods to FIFO or Weighted Average only (excludes LIFO)
- Important Note: Post-ICDS, this flexibility is reduced - LIFO no longer acceptable
Case 3: CIT vs. Ciba of India Ltd. [1968] 69 ITR 692 (SC)
- Issue: Valuation of obsolete and slow-moving inventory
- Held by Supreme Court: If inventory has become obsolete or unsaleable, it should be valued at NRV
- Principle Established: Prudent business practice requires recognizing diminution in value
- Relevance to ICDS II: Supports the "lower of cost or NRV" principle
- Tax Implication: Write-down for obsolescence is allowable if genuine
Case 4: CIT vs. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd. [2009] 312 ITR 254 (SC)
- Issue: Consistency in accounting method for inventory valuation
- Held by Supreme Court: Method of accounting consistently followed cannot be rejected unless not in accordance with accepted accounting principles
- Principle Established: Stability and consistency in accounting methods for tax purposes
- Relevance to ICDS II: ICDS II provides statutory backing to accepted accounting principles
- Post-ICDS Impact: Taxpayer must follow ICDS II irrespective of book method
Case 5: Chainrup Sampatram vs. CIT [1953] 24 ITR 481 (SC)
- Issue: When can market value be taken instead of cost?
- Held by Supreme Court: If market value on valuation date is lower than cost, the lower value must be taken
- Principle Established: Prudent business practice mandates recognizing loss when value declines
- Relevance to ICDS II: Foundation for mandatory "lower of cost or NRV" rule
- Accounting Principle: Conservatism - anticipate losses but not profits
Case 6: Sakthi Trading Co. vs. CIT [2001] 250 ITR 871 (Mad)
- Issue: LIFO method and its acceptability
- Held by Madras High Court: LIFO, though recognized internationally, was accepted when consistently followed
- Principle Established: Pre-ICDS flexibility in choosing methods
- Current Status: ICDS II specifically prohibits LIFO - case now has limited relevance
- Transition Issue: Taxpayers using LIFO had to switch to FIFO/WAC from AY 2016-17
Case 7: CIT vs. A. Raman & Co. [1968] 67 ITR 11 (SC)
- Issue: Treatment of interest on borrowed capital for purchase of inventory
- Held by Supreme Court: Interest could be treated as revenue expenditure
- Accounting Treatment: Pre-ICDS, interest could sometimes be capitalized
- ICDS II Position: Interest specifically EXCLUDED from inventory cost
- Current Law: Interest is deductible expense, cannot be added to inventory cost
Case 8: Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. CIT [1979] 116 ITR 1 (SC)
- Issue: Subsidy received and its effect on inventory valuation
- Held by Supreme Court: Subsidy related to cost of acquisition should reduce cost
- Principle Established: Direct subsidies on purchase reduce inventory cost
- ICDS II Alignment: Subsidies, rebates, duty drawback reduce purchase cost
- Tax Effect: Lower inventory cost → Higher COGS → Lower taxable income
8.2 Summary of Judicial Principles
| Principle | Judicial Basis | ICDS II Codification |
|---|---|---|
| Cost or NRV - Lower | British Paints, Chainrup Sampatram | Mandatory under ICDS II |
| Consistency | Shahzada Nand, Woodward Governor | Same method year-on-year required |
| Obsolescence Write-down | Ciba of India | Permitted, no reversal allowed |
| LIFO Method | Sakthi Trading (pre-ICDS) | Specifically prohibited |
| Interest Exclusion | A. Raman & Co. | Excluded from inventory cost |
| Subsidy Treatment | Sutlej Cotton Mills | Reduces purchase cost |
9. INVENTORY VALUATION FLOWCHART
(e.g., customized goods, special projects)
Actual cost of each item
First-In, First-Out
Average of all purchases
Include: Purchase cost + Conversion costs + Other costs
Exclude: Interest, storage, admin OH, abnormal waste
NRV = Estimated Selling Price - Completion Costs - Selling Costs
Which is lower?
No write-down required
Write-down = Cost - NRV
(No reversal allowed in future)
Deduct NRV of by-products from main product cost
Report in Tax Computation
Important Reminders:
- ✗ LIFO method is NOT permitted
- ✗ Interest cost CANNOT be included
- ✗ Exchange differences NOT included
- ✗ Write-down reversal NOT allowed
- ✓ Consistency in method is mandatory
- ✓ By-products reduce main product cost
10. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
Answer:
No, ICDS II is applicable only to:
- Taxpayers computing income under "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession" or "Income from Other Sources"
- Following mercantile system of accounting
Exemptions:
- Individual/HUF following cash system
- Taxpayers under presumptive taxation (Section 44AD, 44ADA, 44AE)
Answer:
NO. LIFO (Last-In-First-Out) method is specifically prohibited under ICDS II.
Permitted Methods:
- FIFO (First-In-First-Out)
- Weighted Average Cost
- Specific Identification (for non-interchangeable items)
Impact: Taxpayers who were using LIFO had to mandatorily switch to FIFO or WAC from Assessment Year 2016-17.
Answer:
NO. Interest cost is specifically excluded from inventory cost under ICDS II.
Difference from AS 2:
- AS 2 allows capitalization of interest if inventory qualifies as qualifying asset
- ICDS II prohibits inclusion of any interest cost
Tax Impact: Creates book-tax difference requiring adjustments in tax computation.
Treatment: Interest is claimed as revenue expenditure, not added to inventory cost.
Answer:
Definition: NRV = Estimated Selling Price - Estimated Costs of Completion - Estimated Costs Necessary to Make the Sale
Components:
- Estimated Selling Price: Expected price in ordinary course of business
- Completion Costs: Further costs to complete the goods (for WIP/Raw materials)
- Selling Costs: Commission, freight, packaging, marketing costs
Example:
- Selling Price: ₹1,00,000
- Completion Cost: ₹20,000
- Selling Cost: ₹10,000
- NRV = ₹1,00,000 - ₹20,000 - ₹10,000 = ₹70,000
Answer:
NO. Once inventory is written down to NRV, reversal is NOT permitted under ICDS II, even if circumstances improve.
Comparison:
| Aspect | ICDS II | AS 2 / Ind AS 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Write-down | Allowed | Allowed |
| Reversal | NOT Allowed | Allowed |
Rationale: Conservative approach for tax purposes - once value declines, new lower value becomes the base cost.
Answer:
Treatment: By-products are valued at Net Realizable Value (NRV) and the value is DEDUCTED from the cost of the main product.
Example:
- Total Production Cost of Main Product: ₹5,00,000
- By-product generated: Scrap with NRV of ₹30,000
- Net Cost of Main Product = ₹5,00,000 - ₹30,000 = ₹4,70,000
Accounting Entry:
- Debit: By-product Stock A/c - ₹30,000
- Credit: Main Product/Production A/c - ₹30,000
Answer:
Principle: Joint costs should be allocated on a rational and consistent basis.
Common Methods:
- Sales Value Method: Allocate based on relative sales value at split-off point
- Physical Quantity Method: Allocate based on weight, volume, or units produced
- Net Realizable Value Method: Allocate based on NRV if products require further processing
Key Requirement: The method chosen must be:
- Rational and justifiable
- Consistently applied from year to year
- Documented with proper supporting
Answer:
NO. Under ICDS II, commodity brokers and traders CANNOT use mark-to-market (MTM) valuation.
Required Method: Must value at lower of cost or NRV
Difference from AS 2:
- AS 2 permits commodity brokers-traders to value at NRV (essentially MTM)
- ICDS II does not allow this exemption
Impact:
- Creates significant book-tax differences for commodity traders
- Taxable income differs from book profit
- Requires detailed reconciliation in tax computation
Answer:
Treatment: Subsidies, rebates, duty drawbacks, and CENVAT credit REDUCE the purchase cost of inventory.
Formula:
Net Purchase Cost = Invoice Price - Trade Discounts - Rebates - Subsidies - Duty Drawback + Non-refundable Taxes + Transport
Example:
- Invoice Price: ₹1,00,000
- Trade Discount: ₹5,000
- Government Subsidy: ₹10,000
- Transport: ₹3,000
- Net Cost = ₹1,00,000 - ₹5,000 - ₹10,000 + ₹3,000 = ₹88,000
Tax Impact: Lower inventory cost leads to higher COGS and lower taxable profit in the year of sale.
Answer:
Excluded Costs (NEVER include):
| Cost Type | Examples | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Abnormal Waste | Abnormal spoilage, fire loss | Charge to P&L directly |
| Storage Costs | Warehouse rent, insurance | Period cost - P&L |
| Administrative OH | Office expenses, salaries | Period cost - P&L |
| Selling Costs | Marketing, commission, freight out | Period cost - P&L |
| Interest Cost | Borrowing costs, finance charges | Finance cost - P&L |
| Exchange Differences | Foreign exchange fluctuation | Separate line item - P&L |
Remember: Only costs incurred to bring inventory to PRESENT LOCATION and PRESENT CONDITION can be included.
Answer:
Major Differences:
| Parameter | ICDS II | AS 2 / Ind AS 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Tax computation | Financial reporting |
| LIFO Method | Prohibited | AS 2: Allowed; Ind AS 2: Prohibited |
| Interest Cost | Not includible | Can be capitalized if qualifying |
| MTM for Commodity | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Write-down Reversal | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Exchange Differences | Not includible | May be included in some cases |
Implication: Companies need to maintain separate records for book and tax purposes, requiring careful reconciliation.
Answer:
YES. Consistency is absolutely mandatory under ICDS II.
Requirements:
- Same cost formula (FIFO or WAC) must be used consistently from year to year
- Cannot change method arbitrarily
- Change only if required by law or results in more appropriate presentation
If Change Required:
- Obtain approval from tax authorities
- Provide valid business justification
- Make proper disclosures
- Adjust opening inventory as per new method
Judicial Support: Shahzada Nand & Sons case, Woodward Governor case emphasize consistency.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Fundamental Rule: Value inventories at LOWER of Cost or Net Realizable Value
- Cost Formula: Use FIFO or Weighted Average (LIFO prohibited)
- Exclusions: Interest, storage costs, administrative overheads, abnormal waste - NOT included
- No Reversals: Write-downs cannot be reversed in future years
- Consistency: Same method must be followed year after year
- By-products: Valued at NRV and deducted from main product cost
- Book-Tax Differences: ICDS differs from AS/Ind AS requiring reconciliation
- Subsidies: Reduce purchase cost of inventory
- No MTM: Commodity traders cannot use mark-to-market under ICDS II
- Applicability: From Assessment Year 2016-17 for eligible taxpayers
