Quick Navigation
Disclaimer: This resource is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
1. Introduction to ICDS X
Overview
- Full Name: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) X - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
- Notification: Notified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) under Section 145(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Applicability Date: Assessment Year 2017-18 onwards
- Purpose: To standardize the computation of income and disclosure requirements for provisions, contingent liabilities, and contingent assets
- Based On: Accounting Standard (AS) 29 - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (with modifications)
Importance
- Uniformity: Ensures consistent treatment across taxpayers
- Transparency: Improves disclosure and reduces disputes
- Tax Compliance: Aligns accounting with tax computation principles
- Certainty: Provides clear guidelines for recognition and measurement
2. Scope and Applicability
Applicable To
- All Taxpayers: Following mercantile system of accounting
- Entities: Companies, firms, LLPs, individuals (maintaining books)
- Income Heads: Profits and Gains of Business or Profession
Not Applicable To
- Insurance Contracts: Covered under specific insurance regulations
- Financial Instruments: Derivatives and other financial contracts
- Executory Contracts: Unless the contract is onerous
- Cash System Taxpayers: Those following cash basis accounting
| Category | Covered Under ICDS X | Excluded from ICDS X |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions | Warranty provisions, Legal claims, Restructuring costs | Provisions arising from financial instruments |
| Contingent Liabilities | Pending lawsuits, Guarantees given | Insurance contract liabilities |
| Contingent Assets | Possible insurance claims, Legal claims receivable | Assets from insurance business |
| Contracts | Onerous contracts | Executory contracts (unless onerous) |
3. Key Definitions
A. Provision
- Definition: A liability which can be measured only by using a substantial degree of estimation
- Characteristics:
- Present obligation (legal or constructive)
- Arises from past events
- Probable outflow of resources
- Reliable estimate can be made
- Examples: Warranty provisions, Legal claim provisions, Restructuring provisions
B. Contingent Liability
- Definition: A possible obligation arising from past events whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the enterprise
- OR: A present obligation where:
- Outflow is not probable, OR
- Amount cannot be reliably estimated
- Examples: Pending lawsuits, Guarantees issued, Possible fines or penalties
C. Contingent Asset
- Definition: A possible asset arising from past events whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the enterprise
- Characteristics:
- Not recognized in books
- Disclosed only when inflow is probable
- Recognized when realization is virtually certain
- Examples: Insurance claims receivable, Legal claims in favor, Pending tax refunds
D. Legal Obligation
- Definition: Obligation derived from a contract, legislation, or other operation of law
- Examples: Contractual obligations, Statutory requirements, Court orders
E. Constructive Obligation
- Definition: Obligation arising from enterprise's actions where:
- An established pattern of past practice
- Published policies
- Sufficiently specific current statement
- Creates valid expectation in other parties
- Examples: Product returns policy, Environmental cleanup (beyond legal requirement)
F. Onerous Contract
- Definition: Contract where unavoidable costs of meeting obligations exceed economic benefits expected
- Treatment: Provision must be recognized for onerous contracts
- Example: Lease contract where rent exceeds sublease income
| Aspect | Provision | Contingent Liability | Contingent Asset |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition | Recognized in books | NOT recognized in books | NOT recognized in books |
| Probability | Probable outflow (>50%) | Possible outflow (10-50%) | Possible inflow |
| Measurement | Best estimate required | Not measured | Not measured |
| Disclosure | Disclosed in notes | Disclosed in notes (unless remote) | Disclosed only if probable |
| Tax Treatment | Deductible when recognized | Not deductible | Not taxable until realized |
4. Recognition Criteria
A. Recognition of Provisions
A provision shall be recognized when ALL three conditions are met:
- Condition 1: Present Obligation
- Enterprise has present obligation (legal or constructive)
- Obligation must result from past event
- Past event creates obligation independent of future actions
- Condition 2: Probable Outflow
- Probable that outflow of resources will be required
- "Probable" means likelihood is MORE than 50%
- Assessment based on evidence available at year-end
- Condition 3: Reliable Estimate
- Reliable estimate of obligation amount can be made
- Extreme cases where no estimate possible are rare
- Use of estimates is essential part of accounting
B. Recognition of Contingent Liabilities
- NOT Recognized: Contingent liabilities are NOT recognized in financial statements
- Disclosed: Must be disclosed in notes (unless probability is remote)
- Re-assessment: Continuously assessed; may become provision if probability increases
C. Recognition of Contingent Assets
- NOT Recognized: Contingent assets are NOT recognized
- Disclosed When Probable: Disclosed in notes only when inflow is probable
- Recognized When Certain: Recognized as asset when realization is virtually certain
| Scenario | Probability of Outflow | Reliable Estimate Possible? | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Present obligation, likely outflow | Probable (>50%) | Yes | Recognize Provision |
| Present obligation, possible outflow | Possible (10-50%) | Yes/No | Disclose as Contingent Liability |
| Possible obligation | Any | Any | Disclose as Contingent Liability |
| Present obligation, unlikely outflow | Remote (<10%) | Any | No disclosure required |
| Present obligation, likely outflow | Probable (>50%) | No | Disclose as Contingent Liability |
5. Measurement of Provisions
A. Best Estimate
- Principle: Amount recognized should be the best estimate of expenditure required to settle the obligation
- Consideration: Risks and uncertainties surrounding the events
- Basis: Judgement of management supplemented by experience and expert reports
B. Single Obligation vs Multiple Obligations
- Single Obligation: Use most likely outcome (mid-point of range if outcomes are continuous)
- Large Population: Use expected value method (weighted average of all possible outcomes)
C. Present Value
- Time Value: Where effect of time value of money is material, provision should be discounted
- Discount Rate: Pre-tax rate reflecting current market assessments and risks specific to liability
- ICDS Modification: Discounting NOT permitted under ICDS X (key difference from AS 29)
D. Future Events
- Reflection: Future events should be reflected in provision amount where sufficient objective evidence exists
- Technology: Expected technological improvements considered if objective evidence available
- Legislation: Changes in law considered only if virtually certain to be enacted
E. Reimbursements
- Recognition: Expected reimbursements recognized only when receipt is virtually certain
- Treatment: Recognized as separate asset, not offset against provision
- Amount: Should not exceed amount of provision
- Income Statement: Expense may be presented net of reimbursement
F. Review and Adjustment
- Annual Review: Provisions reviewed at each balance sheet date
- Adjustment: Adjusted to reflect current best estimate
- Reversal: Reversed if no longer probable that outflow will be required
- Use: Used only for expenditures for which provision was originally recognized
| Measurement Aspect | Method | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Best Estimate | Management judgement + expert opinion | Legal claim: Lawyer's estimate of settlement |
| Single Obligation | Most likely outcome | Warranty claim for specific product defect |
| Large Population | Expected value (weighted average) | Warranty provision for 10,000 units sold |
| Discounting | NOT allowed under ICDS X | Long-term environmental provision - use nominal value |
| Reimbursement | Separate asset when virtually certain | Insurance recovery for warranty claims |
6. Disclosure Requirements
A. Provisions - Disclosure Required
- Carrying Amount: Beginning and end of period
- Additions: Provisions made during the period
- Utilization: Amounts used (incurred and charged against provision)
- Reversal: Unused amounts reversed during period
- Nature of Obligation: Brief description of nature and timing
- Uncertainties: Indication about timing and amount
- Reimbursements: Amount expected to be reimbursed
B. Contingent Liabilities - Disclosure Required
- Brief Description: Nature of contingent liability
- Estimate: Estimate of financial effect (if practicable)
- Uncertainties: Indication of uncertainties
- Reimbursement: Possibility of any reimbursement
- Exception: No disclosure if probability is remote
C. Contingent Assets - Disclosure Required
- When: Only when inflow of economic benefits is probable
- Brief Description: Nature of contingent asset
- Estimate: Estimate of financial effect (if practicable)
- Caution: Disclosure should not create misleading impression about realization
D. Exemptions from Disclosure
- Prejudicial Information: In extremely rare cases where disclosure would seriously prejudice position in dispute
- Alternative Disclosure: General nature of dispute and fact/reason for non-disclosure
| Item | Recognition | Disclosure | Key Information |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provision | ✓ Yes | ✓ Mandatory | Opening/closing balance, additions, utilization, reversal, nature, timing |
| Contingent Liability | ✗ No | ✓ Yes (unless remote) | Nature, estimate, uncertainties, reimbursement |
| Contingent Asset | ✗ No | ✓ Only if probable | Nature, estimate (avoid misleading impression) |
| Remote Contingency | ✗ No | ✗ No | No disclosure required |
7. Practical Examples
Example 1: Warranty Provision
Scenario: ABC Ltd manufactures electronic goods and provides 2-year warranty. Based on past experience, warranty costs are estimated at 2% of sales.
Sales for FY 2024-25: ₹1,00,00,000
Analysis:
- Present Obligation: Yes (constructive obligation from warranty policy)
- Probable Outflow: Yes (based on past experience)
- Reliable Estimate: Yes (2% of sales = ₹2,00,000)
Treatment: Recognize provision of ₹2,00,000
Journal Entry:
Warranty Expense Dr. ₹2,00,000
To Provision for Warranty ₹2,00,000
(Being provision created for warranty claims)
Tax Treatment: Deductible in year of recognition under ICDS X
Example 2: Legal Claim (Provision)
Scenario: XYZ Ltd is facing a lawsuit for ₹50,00,000. Legal advisors estimate 70% probability of losing and likely settlement of ₹30,00,000.
Analysis:
- Present Obligation: Yes (lawsuit filed)
- Probable Outflow: Yes (70% probability > 50%)
- Reliable Estimate: Yes (₹30,00,000)
Treatment: Recognize provision of ₹30,00,000
Journal Entry:
Legal Claim Expense Dr. ₹30,00,000
To Provision for Legal Claim ₹30,00,000
(Being provision created for probable legal settlement)
Example 3: Contingent Liability
Scenario: PQR Ltd has guaranteed loan of subsidiary for ₹1,00,00,000. Subsidiary is financially sound. Probability of default: 20%.
Analysis:
- Present Obligation: Possible (depends on subsidiary's default)
- Probable Outflow: No (20% < 50%, only possible)
Treatment: NOT recognized as provision. Disclosed as contingent liability in notes.
Disclosure:
Contingent Liability: Corporate guarantee given for subsidiary loan - ₹1,00,00,000
Nature: Guarantee obligation arises only if subsidiary defaults
Financial Effect: Up to ₹1,00,00,000
Example 4: Contingent Asset
Scenario: LMN Ltd has filed insurance claim for ₹25,00,000 for fire damage. Insurance company's assessment is positive. Probability of recovery: 80%.
Analysis:
- Possible Asset: Yes (pending insurance approval)
- Inflow Probable: Yes (80% probability)
- Virtually Certain: No (not yet approved)
Treatment: NOT recognized as asset. Disclosed as contingent asset in notes.
Disclosure:
Contingent Asset: Insurance claim pending for fire damage - ₹25,00,000
Nature: Pending final approval from insurance company
Estimated Recovery: ₹25,00,000 (subject to insurance company approval)
Note: When approval received and virtually certain, recognize as income
Example 5: Onerous Contract
Scenario: DEF Ltd has lease contract with unavoidable annual rent of ₹10,00,000. Property can be subleased for only ₹6,00,000 annually. 3 years remaining.
Analysis:
- Present Obligation: Yes (lease contract)
- Unavoidable Cost: ₹10,00,000 per year
- Economic Benefit: ₹6,00,000 per year
- Loss per year: ₹4,00,000
- Total Loss (3 years): ₹12,00,000
Treatment: Recognize provision for ₹12,00,000 (onerous contract)
Journal Entry:
Onerous Contract Loss Dr. ₹12,00,000
To Provision for Onerous Contract ₹12,00,000
(Being provision for unavoidable losses on lease contract)
Example 6: Restructuring Provision
Scenario: GHI Ltd's board approved detailed restructuring plan on 15-March-2025. Plan announced to employees on 20-March-2025. Financial year ends 31-March-2025. Estimated cost: ₹50,00,000.
Analysis:
- Constructive Obligation: Yes (plan announced before year-end)
- Detailed Plan: Yes (identifies business, locations, employees affected, costs)
- Valid Expectation: Yes (created by announcement)
- Reliable Estimate: Yes (₹50,00,000)
Treatment: Recognize provision of ₹50,00,000 for FY 2024-25
Note: If announcement was after 31-March-2025, no provision in FY 2024-25
| Example | Type | Recognition | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warranty | Provision | Yes | 2,00,000 |
| Legal Claim | Provision | Yes | 30,00,000 |
| Guarantee | Contingent Liability | No (Disclose) | 1,00,00,000 |
| Insurance Claim | Contingent Asset | No (Disclose) | 25,00,000 |
| Onerous Contract | Provision | Yes | 12,00,000 |
| Restructuring | Provision | Yes | 50,00,000 |
8. Important Case Laws
Case Law 1: CIT vs. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Citation: [2009] 312 ITR 254 (SC)
- Issue: Deductibility of provision for warranty
- Facts:
- Assessee created provision for warranty based on past experience
- Revenue contended provision was contingent liability
- Provision was not based on actual ascertained liability
- Held:
- Provision for warranty is allowable deduction
- Scientific basis for estimation makes it acceptable
- Mercantile system requires recognition of accrued liabilities
- Liability crystallizes when sale is made, not when warranty is claimed
- Significance: Established principle that scientifically estimated provisions are deductible
- ICDS X Impact: Aligns with ICDS X recognition criteria for provisions
Case Law 2: Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Citation: [2009] 314 ITR 62 (SC)
- Issue: Provision for warranty expenses
- Facts:
- Company provided 18-month warranty on products
- Created provision @ 2% of sales based on past trends
- Revenue rejected provision as contingent
- Held:
- Warranty provision allowable as business expenditure
- Liability accrues at time of sale, not when claim arises
- Established scientific method validates provision
- Follows mercantile system of accounting
- Significance: Reinforced deductibility of warranty provisions
- ICDS X Impact: Supports recognition when reliable estimate exists
Case Law 3: Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. vs. CIT
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Citation: [2000] 245 ITR 428 (SC)
- Issue: Provision for liquidated damages
- Facts:
- Company created provision for liquidated damages
- Damages were for delayed delivery as per contract
- Actual liability not crystallized
- Held:
- Provision for liquidated damages not allowable
- Liability must be actual, not contingent
- Mere apprehension of liability insufficient
- Deduction allowed only when liability crystallizes
- Significance: Distinguished between actual and contingent liabilities
- ICDS X Impact: Emphasizes need for "present obligation" test
Case Law 4: Metal Box India Ltd. vs. Their Workmen
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Citation: [1969] 73 ITR 53 (SC)
- Issue: Whether gratuity liability is provision or contingent liability
- Facts:
- Company wanted to create provision for gratuity
- Liability dependent on future service and conditions
- Revenue contended it was contingent
- Held:
- Gratuity liability accrues with service rendered
- Not contingent merely because payment deferred
- Provision can be created using actuarial valuation
- Significance: Clarified treatment of employee benefits
- ICDS X Impact: Employee benefits may require provisions if estimable
Case Law 5: Calcutta Co. Ltd. vs. CIT
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Citation: [1959] 37 ITR 1 (SC)
- Issue: Contingent liability vs actual liability
- Facts:
- Company faced potential liability for unpaid debts
- Liability contingent on future events
- Company claimed deduction
- Held:
- Contingent liabilities not deductible
- Liability must be definite and ascertained
- Future contingent events don't create present liability
- Significance: Established principle against contingent liability deduction
- ICDS X Impact: Reinforces non-recognition of contingent liabilities
Case Law 6: TRF Ltd. vs. CIT
- Court: Delhi High Court
- Citation: [2010] 323 ITR 397 (Del)
- Issue: Provision for sales tax demand
- Facts:
- Company received sales tax demand notice
- Matter under appeal with reasonable prospects
- Company created provision
- Held:
- Where liability disputed with reasonable prospects, provision not mandatory
- Depends on facts and probability assessment
- If outflow not probable, disclose as contingent liability
- Significance: Addressed disputed tax demands
- ICDS X Impact: Applies probability test for provisions
| Case Name | Court | Key Principle | ICDS X Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodward Governor | Supreme Court | Scientific warranty provisions deductible | Recognition criteria - reliable estimate |
| Rotork Controls | Supreme Court | Warranty liability accrues at sale | Present obligation concept |
| Bharat Earth Movers | Supreme Court | Contingent liabilities not deductible | Distinction: provision vs contingent |
| Metal Box India | Supreme Court | Gratuity provision allowed | Employee benefit provisions |
| Calcutta Co. | Supreme Court | Contingent liabilities not deductible | Present obligation requirement |
| TRF Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Probability assessment for provisions | Probable outflow criterion |
9. Decision Flowchart
Recognition Decision Flowchart
10. Mind Map - ICDS X
Note: This mind map provides a visual overview of key concepts in ICDS X. Each branch represents a major aspect of the standard.
11. Questions & Answers
Answer:
The main objective of ICDS X is to ensure:
- Appropriate Recognition: Provisions are recognized only when all three criteria (present obligation, probable outflow, reliable estimate) are met
- Proper Measurement: Provisions are measured using best estimates and appropriate techniques
- Sufficient Disclosure: Adequate information is provided to enable users to understand nature, timing, and amount of provisions and contingencies
- Consistency: Uniform treatment across taxpayers for tax computation
- Prevention of Manipulation: Prevents creation of arbitrary provisions for tax avoidance
Answer:
| Aspect | Provision | Contingent Liability |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Present obligation (certain) | Possible obligation OR present obligation with uncertain outcome |
| Probability | Probable outflow (>50%) | Possible outflow (10-50%) OR not probable |
| Recognition | Recognized in books | NOT recognized |
| Measurement | Measured at best estimate | Not measured (disclosed only) |
| Disclosure | Disclosed in notes | Disclosed in notes (unless remote) |
| Tax Deduction | Deductible when recognized | Not deductible |
Answer:
A provision shall be recognized when ALL three conditions are satisfied:
- Present Obligation:
- Enterprise has a present obligation (legal or constructive)
- Obligation arises from a past event (obligating event)
- The past event leaves no realistic alternative but to settle
- Probable Outflow of Resources:
- It is probable (more likely than not) that an outflow of resources will be required
- "Probable" means probability is greater than 50%
- Assessment based on all available evidence
- Reliable Estimate:
- A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of obligation
- Use of estimates is an essential part of accounting
- Cases where no reliable estimate can be made are extremely rare
Important: If any ONE of these conditions is not met, a provision cannot be recognized, and the item should be treated as a contingent liability (if applicable).
Answer:
Provisions should be measured using the following principles:
- Best Estimate: Amount should represent the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date
- Single Obligation: For a single obligation, use the most likely outcome (individual most likely outcome)
- Large Population: For a large population of items, use the expected value method (weighted average of all possible outcomes)
- Risks and Uncertainties: Should be taken into account in reaching the best estimate
- Future Events: Future events should be reflected where there is sufficient objective evidence
- Gains on Disposal: Gains from expected disposal of assets should not be taken into account
- Reimbursements: Should be recognized separately only when receipt is virtually certain
- Annual Review: Provisions should be reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted
- No Discounting: Under ICDS X, discounting is NOT permitted (key difference from AS 29)
Answer:
Recognition Rules for Contingent Assets:
- Generally NOT Recognized: Contingent assets are not recognized in the financial statements because they represent possible assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events
- Disclosure When Probable: A contingent asset is disclosed in the notes when an inflow of economic benefits is probable (more likely than not)
- Recognition When Virtually Certain: A contingent asset is recognized as an actual asset (not contingent anymore) when the realization of income is virtually certain
Example Timeline:
| Stage | Probability | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Stage | Possible (30%) | No recognition, No disclosure |
| Evidence Improves | Probable (70%) | No recognition, Disclose in notes |
| Final Approval | Virtually Certain (99%) | Recognize as asset |
Important: Disclosure of contingent assets should be carefully worded to avoid creating a misleading impression about the likelihood of realization.
Answer:
Definition: An onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received.
Key Features:
- Unavoidable costs are the lower of:
- Cost of fulfilling the contract, OR
- Any compensation or penalties from failure to fulfill
- Contract becomes onerous when total costs exceed total expected benefits
Treatment:
- Recognition: Present obligation under onerous contract must be recognized as a provision
- Measurement: Provision measured at the lower of:
- Expected cost of fulfilling contract
- Expected cost of terminating contract
- Timing: Recognized when contract becomes onerous
Example:
Company has 3-year lease at ₹10 lakh/year. Can sublease for only ₹6 lakh/year.
Loss per year = ₹10L - ₹6L = ₹4 lakh
Total provision = ₹4L × 3 years = ₹12 lakh
Answer:
| Aspect | ICDS X | AS 29 |
|---|---|---|
| Discounting | NOT permitted | Permitted when time value of money is material |
| Purpose | Tax computation under Income Tax Act | Financial reporting under Companies Act |
| Applicability | Taxpayers following mercantile system | All companies |
| Present Value | Must use nominal values | Can use present values for long-term provisions |
| Legal Framework | Section 145(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 | Companies Act, 2013 |
| Objective | Standardize income computation | Fair presentation in financial statements |
Most Significant Difference: The prohibition of discounting under ICDS X is the most material difference, which can result in different provision amounts, especially for long-term obligations.
Answer:
Warranty Provision Calculation Steps:
- Identify Total Sales: Calculate total sales for products covered under warranty
- Determine Warranty Rate: Based on past experience/historical data, determine expected warranty cost as percentage of sales
- Calculate Provision: Provision = Sales × Warranty Rate
- Adjust for Specific Factors:
- Product quality improvements
- Changes in warranty terms
- Known defects in specific batches
- Review Periodically: Update rates based on actual claims experience
Example Calculation:
Sales for FY 2024-25: ₹1,00,00,000
Warranty period: 2 years
Historical warranty cost: 2% of sales (based on last 3 years data)
Calculation:
Provision = ₹1,00,00,000 × 2% = ₹2,00,000
Journal Entry:
Warranty Expense Dr. ₹2,00,000
To Provision for Warranty ₹2,00,000
Annual Review: At year-end, compare actual warranty claims with provision. Adjust provision rate for future years based on actual experience.
Answer:
Mandatory Disclosures for Each Class of Provision:
- Carrying Amount:
- Balance at the beginning of the period
- Balance at the end of the period
- Movement During Period:
- Additional provisions made
- Amounts used (charged against provision)
- Unused amounts reversed
- Description:
- Brief description of nature of obligation
- Expected timing of outflows
- Uncertainties:
- Indication of uncertainties about amount
- Indication of uncertainties about timing
- Reimbursements:
- Amount of any expected reimbursement
- Amount of asset recognized for reimbursement
Example Disclosure Format:
Provision for Warranty:
Opening Balance (01-04-2024): ₹1,50,000
Add: Provision created during year: ₹2,00,000
Less: Claims settled during year: ₹1,20,000
Less: Provision reversed (excess): ₹10,000
Closing Balance (31-03-2025): ₹2,20,000
Nature: Provision for warranty claims on products sold
Timing: Expected to be settled within 24 months
Uncertainties: Actual claims may vary based on product quality
Reimbursements: Insurance coverage of ₹50,000 expected
Answer:
Tax Treatment Summary:
| Item | Recognition | Tax Deduction | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provision | Recognized in books | ✓ Deductible | Year of recognition (if all 3 conditions met) |
| Contingent Liability | NOT recognized | ✗ Not Deductible | Deductible only when crystallizes into actual liability |
| Contingent Asset | NOT recognized | ✗ Not Taxable | Taxable only when realization is virtually certain |
Key Tax Points:
- Provisions: Deductible in the year of creation if they meet ICDS X recognition criteria
- Contingent Liabilities: Not deductible until they become actual liabilities
- Reversal of Provisions: Taxable in year of reversal
- Actual Payment: When provision is utilized, no additional deduction (already claimed)
- Applicability: Applicable from Assessment Year 2017-18 onwards
Important Case Law: Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd. case established that scientifically calculated provisions (like warranty) are deductible for tax purposes.
