The Limitation Act, 1963 (AIBE) C

AIBE 2026 — The Limitation Act, 1963 | Exam Revision Hub

1 · Introduction to the Act

The Limitation Act, 1963 is the law that fixes a time limit within which a person must go to court. If you sleep over your rights and approach the court late, the door of the court may be shut on you — not because you are wrong, but because you are late.

Object & Purpose

  • To consolidate and amend the law on limitation of suits, appeals and applications (see the long title of the Act).
  • To make sure disputes are brought to court within a reasonable, fixed time.
  • It rests on the idea that law helps the vigilant, not those who sleep over their rights.

Why Limitation Matters

  • Evidence fades, witnesses die, documents are lost — stale claims become hard to prove.
  • It gives certainty and finality so a person is not threatened by old claims forever.
  • It pushes people to act promptly and protects the court from very old, weak disputes.

Applicability & Extent (S.1)

  • Short title: The Limitation Act, 1963.
  • It extends to the whole of India (the earlier exception for Jammu & Kashmir was omitted in 2019).
  • It came into force on the date appointed by the Central Government by notification (brought into force on 1 January 1964).

Bar of Remedy, Not of Right

  • As a general rule, limitation only bars the remedy (you cannot sue), it does not destroy the right itself.
  • Important exception — Section 27: in a suit for possession of property, once the limitation period ends, the person's right to that property is extinguished. Here the right itself dies, not just the remedy.
Core idea in one line: Limitation does not ask whether your claim is true — it asks whether you came to court in time.
Jump to:

2 · Topic-wise & Section-wise Notes

Click a topic to open it. The first topic opens by default. Each card gives the relevant sections, a plain-English explanation, key points, an example, a trap to avoid, and the exam takeaway.

Section 2 is the dictionary of the Act. Learn these before anything else.

  • Period of limitation — the time limit fixed for a suit, appeal or application by the Schedule.
  • Prescribed period — the period of limitation computed after applying the provisions of the Act (i.e. period of limitation + the exclusions/extensions allowed by Sections 4–24).
  • Applicant includes a petitioner and persons through whom one derives the right to apply. Application includes a petition.
  • Plaintiff / Defendant include persons from or through whom the right to sue or liability is derived, and legal representatives.
  • Suit does not include an appeal or an application.
  • Tort — a civil wrong which is not exclusively a breach of contract or breach of trust.
  • Good faith — nothing is done in good faith if it is not done with due care and attention.
  • Easement — includes a right (not from contract) to take and use part of the soil or its produce belonging to another.
  • Trustee does not include a benamidar, a mortgagee in possession after the mortgage is satisfied, or a person in wrongful possession without title.
Trap: Students mix up "period of limitation" (just the Schedule figure) with "prescribed period" (the Schedule figure after exclusions/extensions). The exam loves this difference.
Exam takeaway: "Good faith = due care and attention" and "prescribed period = limitation + exclusions" are repeat questions.

Section 3 is the heart of the Act.

  • Subject to Sections 4–24, every suit instituted, appeal preferred or application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed.
  • This happens even if limitation has not been pleaded as a defence — the court must dismiss it on its own.
  • So limitation is a duty cast on the court, not merely a defence for the defendant.
  • S.3(2) tells us when a suit is "instituted" — ordinarily when the plaint is presented to the proper officer; for a pauper, when the application for leave to sue as a pauper is made.
  • A set-off is treated as a separate suit instituted on the date of the main suit; a counter-claim, on the date it is made in court.
Trap: "Limitation must be raised by the defendant, otherwise the suit continues" — FALSE. The court dismisses a time-barred suit even if nobody raises it.
Exam takeaway: S.3 → mandatory dismissal of time-barred matters, suo motu, even without a plea.

Section 4 — Court closed. If the last day of the prescribed period falls on a day the court is closed, the suit/appeal/application may be filed on the day the court reopens. A court is "closed" if during any part of its normal working hours it remains closed that day.

Section 5 — Extension (Condonation of delay).

  • Any appeal or application may be admitted after the prescribed period if "sufficient cause" for the delay is shown.
  • Section 5 does NOT apply to suits. A suit cannot get its delay condoned under S.5.
  • It also does not apply to applications under Order XXI CPC (execution applications).
  • Being misled by an order, practice or judgment of the High Court may amount to sufficient cause (Explanation).
Trap: Thinking S.5 can save a late suit. It cannot — S.5 is only for appeals and applications (and not Order XXI execution applications).
Exam takeaway: S.4 = reopening day rule; S.5 = sufficient cause for appeals/applications only.

Section 6 — Legal disability. If, at the time the limitation period would start, the person entitled to sue (or to apply for execution of a decree) is a minor, insane, or an idiot, he may file after the disability ends, within the same period that would otherwise have been allowed from that starting point.

  • If hit by two disabilities together, or a fresh disability before the first ends, time runs from when all disabilities cease.
  • If the disability continues till death, the legal representative gets the same period after the death.
  • Explanation: "minor" includes a child in the womb.

Section 7 — Disability of one of several persons. Where several are jointly entitled and a valid discharge can be given without the disabled person's concurrence, time runs against all. If no such discharge is possible, time does not run until one can give a discharge or the disability ceases.

Section 8 — Special exceptions (the outer cap). S.6 and S.7 do not apply to pre-emption suits, and in no case can they extend limitation by more than three years from the cessation of disability or death.

Trap: Disability must exist at the moment time begins to run. A disability arising later does not help (see S.9).
Exam takeaway: S.6 protects minor/insane/idiot; S.8 caps the benefit at 3 years after disability ends.

Section 9 — Continuous running. "Once time has begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability to sue stops it." Limitation is like a clock that, once started, does not pause for later difficulties. (One proviso: where letters of administration of a creditor's estate are granted to his debtor, running is suspended while the administration continues.)

Section 10 — Suits against trustees. A suit against a person in whom property is vested in trust for a specific purpose (or against his representatives) to follow such trust property is NOT barred by any length of time. Religious/charitable endowment property is treated as trust property.

Section 11 — Contracts made outside India. Suits in India on contracts made in a foreign country are governed by the limitation rules of this Act; a foreign rule of limitation is generally no defence unless it has extinguished the contract and both parties were domiciled there.

Trap: Confusing S.6 (disability before time starts → helps) with S.9 (disability after time starts → does not stop the clock).
Exam takeaway: S.9 = clock never pauses once started; S.10 = no limitation for following trust property.

These sections tell us which days are left out while counting the period.

  • S.12 — Exclusion in legal proceedings: exclude the day from which the period is reckoned; for appeals/revision/review, exclude the day of the judgment and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the decree/order/judgment/award.
  • S.13 — Pauper applications: exclude the time spent prosecuting in good faith an application to sue/appeal as a pauper.
  • S.14 — Wrong forum (no jurisdiction): exclude the time spent bona fide, with due diligence, in another civil proceeding for the same matter in a court that could not entertain it due to defect of jurisdiction or like cause.
  • S.15 — Other exclusions: time during a stay/injunction; period of notice or time for getting Government consent/sanction; period for receiver/liquidator (with a 3-month rule); time a defendant was absent from India.
Trap: Under S.14 the wrong-forum proceeding must be bona fide and pursued with due diligence; carelessly chosen forums get no benefit.
Exam takeaway: S.12 = copy time excluded; S.14 = bona fide wrong-court time excluded; S.15 = stay/notice time excluded.

These let a fresh limitation period start — but only if done correctly and before the original period expires.

  • S.18 — Acknowledgment in writing: if, before the prescribed period expires, the party against whom the right is claimed makes a written, signed acknowledgment of liability, a fresh period runs from the date of signing.
  • The acknowledgment may be valid even if it does not state the exact nature of the right, or even if coupled with a refusal to pay.
  • S.19 — Part payment: a payment towards a debt or interest, made before expiry by the person liable, starts a fresh period from the date of payment — but the payment (except certain old interest) must be acknowledged in the handwriting of, or in writing signed by, the payer.
  • S.20 deals with who can sign/pay (e.g. duly authorised agents, guardians) and clarifies the effect on joint contractors, partners, HUF managers, etc.
Trap: An acknowledgment or payment after the period has already expired does NOT revive a dead claim. It must be made before expiry.
Exam takeaway: S.18/19 → fresh start only if done in writing/signed and before expiry.

Section 17. Where a suit/application is based on the defendant's fraud, or the right is concealed by fraud, or it is for relief from a mistake, or a necessary document is fraudulently concealed, then —

  • The period of limitation does not begin to run until the plaintiff/applicant has discovered the fraud or mistake, or could have discovered it with reasonable diligence;
  • In case of a concealed document, until he first had the means to produce or compel its production.
  • Proviso (protection of innocent buyers): this benefit cannot disturb property bought for value by an innocent purchaser who had no notice of the fraud, mistake or concealment.
Trap: S.17 delays the start of limitation (postpones the clock); it does not "extend" or "condone" an already-running period.
Exam takeaway: Fraud/mistake/concealment → time starts from discovery (with reasonable diligence), but innocent purchasers are protected.

Section 25 — Easements by prescription. Where access to light/air, or a way, watercourse, use of water or other easement, has been enjoyed:

  • peaceably, openly, as of right, without interruption, for twenty years,
  • the right becomes absolute and indefeasible.
  • If the property belongs to the Government, the period is thirty years instead of twenty.
  • The 20-year period must end within two years before the suit in which the claim is contested.
  • An "interruption" must be an actual discontinuance submitted to / acquiesced in for one year after notice.

Section 26 protects a reversioner of the servient land in certain life-interest/long-lease situations by excluding that time from the 20-year count.

Trap: Easement period is 20 years (private) but 30 years against Government — and enjoyment must be "as of right".
Exam takeaway: Remember 20 / 30 years and the four ingredients: peaceful, open, as of right, uninterrupted.

Section 22 — Continuing breaches and torts. In a continuing breach of contract or a continuing tort, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment during which the breach or tort continues.

Section 23 — Acts not actionable without special damage. For a suit for compensation where the wrong is actionable only when some specific injury results, time is computed from the time when the injury results.

  • A completed wrong (one-time act) → limitation runs once, from the date of the act.
  • A continuing wrong (the wrongful state continues, e.g. a continuing obstruction) → fresh limitation keeps arising every moment.
Trap: Don't confuse a continuing wrong with the recurring consequences of a single completed act. Only a genuinely continuing wrong gives a fresh period each moment.
Exam takeaway: Continuing breach/tort (S.22) → fresh limitation every moment it continues.

S.16 — Death before accrual of right. If a person dies before the right to sue accrues (or the right accrues only on death), limitation is computed from when there is a legal representative capable of suing or being sued. (This does not apply to pre-emption suits or suits for possession of immovable property / hereditary office.)

S.21 — Adding or substituting a party. When a new plaintiff or defendant is added after the suit is instituted, the suit is deemed instituted against him only from the date he was made a party — unless the omission was due to a bona fide mistake, when the court may relate it back to an earlier date.

S.24 — Computation of time in instruments. All instruments are deemed to be made with reference to the Gregorian calendar for the purposes of this Act.

Trap: Under S.21 the general rule is that limitation against a newly added party runs from the date of addition — relation back is only the exception (bona fide mistake).
Exam takeaway: S.16 = time runs from existence of a capable legal representative; S.24 = Gregorian calendar.

The Schedule [see S.2(j) and S.3] is a big table with three columns: (1) description of the suit/appeal/application, (2) period of limitation, (3) time from which the period begins to run. It is divided into three Divisions:

  • First Division — Suits (Articles 1 to 113).
  • Second Division — Appeals (Articles 114 to 117).
  • Third Division — Applications (Articles 118 to 137).

Most useful recurring periods to memorise:

  • 3 years — most contract/account/money suits; Art 113 (residuary suit) and Art 137 (residuary application).
  • 12 years — possession of immovable property based on title (Art 65); execution of a decree (Art 136); mortgage suits for sale/possession.
  • 30 years — mortgagor to redeem (Art 61(a)); mortgagee for foreclosure (Art 63(a)); Government suits (Art 112).
  • 1 year — torts in Part VII (Art 72–80) and pre-emption (Art 97).
  • 90 days — appeal to a High Court from a decree/order (Art 116(a)); 30 days — appeal to other courts (Art 116(b)).
Trap: Article 65 (possession on title) = 12 years from when the defendant's possession becomes adverse — not from the date of purchase.
Exam takeaway: Lock in 1 / 3 / 12 / 30 years and the residuary Articles 113 & 137.

S.27 — Extinguishment of right to property. When the limitation period for a suit for possession of property ends, the person's right to that property is extinguished. This is the statutory basis of adverse possession — and the key exception to "limitation bars remedy, not right".

S.29 — Savings.

  • Nothing in the Act affects S.25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
  • Where a special or local law prescribes a different period, S.3 applies as if that period were in the Schedule; Sections 4–24 apply only so far as they are not expressly excluded by that special/local law.
  • The Act generally does not apply to suits/proceedings under marriage and divorce law (save as otherwise provided).

S.30–S.31 are transitional provisions dealing with suits/appeals whose period under the old 1908 Act was shorter, and with barred or pending matters at the commencement of the 1963 Act. S.28 and S.32 stand repealed.

Trap: S.27 is the only place where limitation kills the right itself; everywhere else only the remedy is barred.
Exam takeaway: S.27 = adverse possession / right extinguished; S.29(2) = special law period plugs into S.3.

3 · Reference Tables

Table 1 — Basic Definitions & Concepts (S.2)

TermMeaning under the Act
Period of limitationTime fixed for a suit/appeal/application by the Schedule.
Prescribed periodPeriod of limitation computed after applying Sections 4–24 (i.e. with exclusions/extensions).
SuitDoes not include an appeal or an application.
TortA civil wrong, not exclusively breach of contract or trust.
Good faithNothing is done in good faith unless done with due care and attention.
EasementA right (not from contract) to take/use part of the soil or produce of another's land.
TrusteeExcludes a benamidar, a satisfied-mortgagee in possession, and a wrongful possessor without title.
Applicant / Application"Applicant" includes a petitioner; "application" includes a petition.

Table 2 — Key Distinctions

DistinctionPoint APoint B
Limitation vs PrescriptionLimitation bars the remedy after time runs out.Prescription (S.25/S.27) creates or extinguishes a right by lapse of time (e.g. easements, adverse possession).
Suit vs Appeal vs ApplicationSuit: First Division, often 3/12/30 yrs; no S.5 condonation.Appeal & Application: Second/Third Divisions, often days; S.5 condonation available (not Order XXI).
Acknowledgment (S.18) vs Part Payment (S.19)S.18: written, signed admission of liability before expiry → fresh period.S.19: actual payment towards debt/interest before expiry, with written/signed proof → fresh period.
Continuing breach (S.22) vs Completed breachContinuing: fresh limitation every moment it continues.Completed: limitation runs once, from the date of the single act.
Legal disability (S.6) vs Exclusion of time (S.12–15)S.6: delays start of period for minor/insane/idiot.S.12–15: removes specific periods (copy time, stay, wrong forum) from the count.
Bar of remedy vs Extinguishment of rightGeneral rule: only the remedy is barred.S.27: in possession suits the right itself is extinguished.

Table 3 — Important Limitation Periods (Schedule Articles)

ArticleDescriptionPeriodStarts from
Art 54Specific performance of a contract3 yearsDate fixed for performance, or when refusal is noticed
Art 55Compensation for breach of any contract3 yearsWhen the contract is broken
Art 58To obtain any other declaration3 yearsWhen the right to sue first accrues
Art 61(a)Mortgagor to redeem / recover possession30 yearsWhen the right to redeem accrues
Art 62To enforce payment of money charged on immovable property12 yearsWhen the money sued for becomes due
Art 65Possession of immovable property based on title12 yearsWhen the defendant's possession becomes adverse
Art 72–80Various torts (Part VII)1 yearWhen the act/omission/injury occurs
Art 82Fatal Accidents Act suits2 yearsDate of the death of the person killed
Art 97Right of pre-emption1 yearWhen the purchaser takes possession / sale is registered
Art 113Any suit with no period provided elsewhere3 yearsWhen the right to sue accrues
Art 116(a)Appeal to High Court from a decree/order (CPC)90 daysDate of the decree or order
Art 116(b)Appeal to other court from a decree/order (CPC)30 daysDate of the decree or order
Art 124Review of judgment (court other than Supreme Court)30 daysDate of the decree or order
Art 136Execution of any decree/order of a civil court12 yearsWhen the decree/order becomes enforceable
Art 137Any other application (residuary)3 yearsWhen the right to apply accrues

Table 4 — Condonation & Exclusion Quick Reference

SectionWhat it doesOne-line memory hook
S.4Last day on a closed court → file on reopening day"Court shut? File when it reopens."
S.5Condones delay in appeals/applications for sufficient cause"Sufficient cause saves appeals/applications, not suits."
S.12Excludes the first day & copy-time"Day 1 out, copy time out."
S.14Excludes bona fide time in wrong forum"Honest mistake of court = excluded."
S.15Excludes stay/injunction, notice, receiver time, absence from India"Stay & notice periods don't count."
S.17Postpones start till fraud/mistake discovered"Clock starts at discovery."
S.18/19Fresh period on written acknowledgment / part payment before expiry"Admit or pay in time → fresh start."

4 · Concept Flowchart

How a court tests a matter for limitation, step by step.

Matter filed in court Find the prescribed period (Schedule + Sections 4–24) Was it filed within the prescribed period? YES Court proceeds to hear on merits NO Any saving provision applies? S.4 closed court · S.5 condonation · S.6 disability · S.12–17 exclusion · S.18/19 fresh period YES Time saved / period extended NO Barred by Section 3 dismissed even if not pleaded Is it a suit for possession of property? YES S.27: right to property extinguished NO Only remedy barred underlying right survives

5 · Mind Map

The whole Act on one screen for last-minute revision.

Limitation Act, 1963 Bar & Basics S.1–3 · definitions, dismissal Extensions / Disability S.4–9 · closed court, S.5, minors Computation S.12–16 · exclusions of time Fresh Period S.17–19 · fraud, acknowledgment Possession S.25–27 · easements, S.27 Schedule Suits · Appeals · Applications

6 · Study Roadmap for AIBE 2026

Follow these steps in order — each builds on the last.

1 Definitions (S.2) & Bar of limitation (S.3) Build the vocabulary & the core rule first 2 Extensions: S.4 closed court, S.5 condonation Plus disability — S.6, S.7, S.8, S.9 3 Computation & exclusions (S.12–S.16) Learn which days are left out 4 Fresh-start rules: S.17 fraud, S.18/19 admission Understand when the clock restarts 5 Possession: S.25 easements, S.27 adverse The right-extinguishing provisions 6 Memorise key Schedule periods + MCQs 1 / 3 / 12 / 30 yrs · Art 113 & 137 · revise

7 · Worked Examples

Each box shows when time begins, pauses, extends, or is excluded.

Time BEGINS

Money lent on demand

A lends B money repayable on demand. Under Schedule Art 21, the 3-year clock starts when the loan is made — not when A first asks for it back.

Time PAUSES

Stay order (S.15)

A's suit is stayed by an injunction for 8 months. That whole period of stay is excluded while counting limitation — the clock is paused during the stay.

Time EXTENDS

Acknowledgment (S.18)

Before the 3-year period ends, debtor B signs a letter admitting the debt. A fresh 3-year period runs from the date B signed — the clock restarts.

Time EXCLUDED

Wrong court (S.14)

A sues in a court that turns out to have no jurisdiction, acting in good faith and with diligence. The time spent there is excluded when he later sues in the correct court.

Time BEGINS

Fraud discovered (S.17)

A is defrauded but discovers it two years later. Limitation does not start until A discovers (or could reasonably have discovered) the fraud.

Time PAUSES

Minor plaintiff (S.6)

The person entitled to sue is a minor when the right accrues. He may sue within the normal period counted after he attains majority (capped at 3 years by S.8).

8 · AIBE-style MCQs (25)

Attempt first, then open the Answer Key at the bottom. Difficulty is labelled on each question.

  1. Easy The Limitation Act, 1963 came into force on:
    (a) 5 Oct 1963  (b) 1 Jan 1964  (c) 26 Jan 1964  (d) 1 Apr 1963
  2. Easy Under S.3, a time-barred suit is:
    (a) Continued if not objected  (b) Dismissed only if pleaded  (c) Dismissed even if limitation is not pleaded  (d) Referred to arbitration
  3. Moderate Section 5 (condonation of delay) applies to:
    (a) Suits only  (b) Appeals and applications  (c) All Order XXI applications  (d) Suits and appeals only
  4. Easy "Good faith" under the Act requires:
    (a) Honest belief only  (b) Due care and attention  (c) Legal advice  (d) Written record
  5. Moderate If the last day of limitation falls on a day the court is closed (S.4), the matter may be filed:
    (a) By post  (b) On the next working/reopening day  (c) Never  (d) Only with condonation
  6. Moderate Under S.6, legal disability includes a person who is:
    (a) Poor  (b) Illiterate  (c) Minor, insane or idiot  (d) Out of station
  7. Hard Maximum extra time allowed under S.8 after disability ceases is:
    (a) 1 year  (b) 2 years  (c) 3 years  (d) 6 years
  8. Moderate Section 9 says once time begins to run:
    (a) It stops on any later disability  (b) No subsequent disability stops it  (c) It restarts yearly  (d) It doubles
  9. Hard A suit to follow trust property against a trustee (S.10) is:
    (a) Barred after 12 years  (b) Barred after 30 years  (c) Not barred by any length of time  (d) Barred after 3 years
  10. Moderate Under S.12, in an appeal one excludes:
    (a) Only the first day  (b) The judgment day and time for obtaining copies  (c) All Sundays  (d) Nothing
  11. Hard Section 14 excludes time spent in a wrong forum only if the earlier proceeding was:
    (a) In a criminal court  (b) Bona fide and with due diligence  (c) Withdrawn quickly  (d) Against a different party
  12. Hard Under S.17, where a suit is based on fraud, limitation begins to run from:
    (a) Date of the fraud  (b) Date of filing  (c) When fraud is or could reasonably have been discovered  (d) Date of judgment
  13. Moderate An acknowledgment under S.18 starts a fresh period only if made:
    (a) Orally  (b) After expiry  (c) In writing, signed, before expiry  (d) Before a notary
  14. Moderate Part payment under S.19 gives a fresh period only if:
    (a) Paid in cash  (b) Acknowledged in the payer's handwriting or signed writing  (c) Paid after expiry  (d) Paid in full
  15. Moderate Section 22 deals with:
    (a) Counter-claims  (b) Continuing breaches and torts  (c) Pauper suits  (d) Appeals
  16. Easy Under S.24, instruments are deemed to be made with reference to the:
    (a) Lunar calendar  (b) Saka calendar  (c) Gregorian calendar  (d) Financial year
  17. Moderate Easement by prescription (S.25) for a private party requires enjoyment for:
    (a) 12 years  (b) 20 years  (c) 30 years  (d) 60 years
  18. Hard Against Government property, the prescription period under S.25 is:
    (a) 20 years  (b) 30 years  (c) 12 years  (d) 60 years
  19. Hard Section 27 results in:
    (a) Bar of remedy only  (b) Extinguishment of the right to property  (c) Condonation of delay  (d) Fresh limitation
  20. Easy The residuary article for suits with no other period is:
    (a) Art 113  (b) Art 137  (c) Art 65  (d) Art 1
  21. Moderate The residuary article for applications is:
    (a) Art 113  (b) Art 137  (c) Art 136  (d) Art 58
  22. Hard Limitation for a suit for possession of immovable property based on title (Art 65) is:
    (a) 3 years  (b) 12 years  (c) 30 years  (d) 60 years
  23. Hard Execution of a decree of a civil court (Art 136) carries a limitation of:
    (a) 3 years  (b) 6 years  (c) 12 years  (d) 30 years
  24. Moderate Tort suits in Part VII of the Schedule (Art 72–80) generally carry a period of:
    (a) 1 year  (b) 3 years  (c) 6 months  (d) 2 years
  25. Hard Under S.29(2), where a special law fixes a different period, the period applies as if it were in the Schedule and Sections 4–24 apply:
    (a) Always fully  (b) Never  (c) Only so far as not expressly excluded by the special law  (d) Only to appeals
Jump to:

9 · Short-Answer Questions (15)

  1. Define "period of limitation" and "prescribed period" and state the difference.
  2. What is the effect of Section 3 when a suit is filed after the prescribed period?
  3. State the rule under Section 4 when the court is closed on the last day.
  4. To which proceedings does Section 5 apply, and to which does it not?
  5. Who are persons under "legal disability" as per Section 6?
  6. What is the maximum benefit of time under Section 8?
  7. Explain the principle in Section 9 ("continuous running of time").
  8. Why is a suit against a trustee to follow trust property not barred by time (S.10)?
  9. What time is excluded under Section 12 in computing limitation for an appeal?
  10. State the conditions for excluding time under Section 14.
  11. How does Section 17 treat limitation in cases of fraud or mistake?
  12. What are the requirements of a valid acknowledgment under Section 18?
  13. Distinguish a continuing breach (S.22) from a completed breach.
  14. State the prescription periods for easements under Section 25.
  15. Explain the effect of Section 27 and how it differs from the general rule.

10 · Descriptive / Long-Answer Questions (8)

  1. "Limitation bars the remedy but not the right." Examine this statement with reference to the Limitation Act, 1963, and the exception under Section 27.
  2. Discuss the scheme of condonation of delay under Section 5. What amounts to "sufficient cause"? Why does it not apply to suits?
  3. Explain the provisions relating to legal disability (Sections 6, 7 and 8) with suitable examples.
  4. Describe the various exclusions of time provided under Sections 12 to 15 in computing the period of limitation.
  5. Explain the effect of acknowledgment (S.18) and part payment (S.19) on the period of limitation. What conditions must be satisfied?
  6. How does fraud, mistake or concealment of documents affect the running of limitation under Section 17?
  7. Explain acquisition of easements by prescription under Section 25 and extinguishment of right under Section 27.
  8. Describe the structure of the Schedule to the Act and the most important limitation periods a candidate should remember.

11 · Answer Key & Explanations

12 · AIBE Quick Revision

Golden rules

  • S.3 → time-barred matter dismissed, even if not pleaded.
  • S.5 → condonation for appeals/applications only.
  • S.9 → clock never pauses once started.
  • S.27 → right extinguished in possession suits.

Periods to memorise

  • 1 yr — torts (Art 72–80), pre-emption (97).
  • 3 yrs — contracts, Art 113 & 137.
  • 12 yrs — possession on title (65), execution (136).
  • 30 yrs — redeem (61a), foreclosure (63a), Govt (112).

Fresh start / postpone

  • S.17 → time starts at discovery of fraud/mistake.
  • S.18 → written, signed acknowledgment before expiry.
  • S.19 → part payment with signed proof before expiry.
  • S.22 → continuing wrong = fresh period each moment.

Exclusions of time

  • S.4 → court closed → reopening day.
  • S.12 → first day + copy time.
  • S.14 → bona fide wrong forum.
  • S.15 → stay, notice, receiver, absence from India.
Disclaimer: This resource is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is prepared from the Bare Act of The Limitation Act, 1963 for AIBE 2026 revision. Always verify against the latest official text before relying on it.

Prepared for AIBE 2026 revision · Digital E-Filing Coach · Amanuddin Education

Scroll to Top