The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (AIBE )

AIBE 2026 — Indian Contract Act, 1872 | Bare Act Study Resource

Introduction

What this Act is, and how to read it

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines and amends the general law relating to contracts. Its purpose is simple: tell us when a promise becomes legally binding, what makes an agreement valid, and what happens when one side breaks it. As a CA and LL.B. student you already meet this Act everywhere — sale agreements, guarantees, agency, bailment of goods. AIBE tests it heavily, mostly on plain section knowledge.

ApplicabilityWhole of India
Commencement1 Sept 1872
Live ChaptersI–VI, VIII–X
RepealedCh. VII (Sale), Ch. XI (Partnership)

Structure of the Act (working chapters)

  • Preliminary (S.1–2) — title, extent, and the all-important definitions.
  • Chapter I (S.3–9) — communication, acceptance and revocation of proposals.
  • Chapter II (S.10–30) — contracts, voidable contracts and void agreements.
  • Chapter III (S.31–36) — contingent contracts.
  • Chapter IV (S.37–67) — performance of contracts.
  • Chapter V (S.68–72) — quasi-contracts (relations resembling contract).
  • Chapter VI (S.73–75) — consequences of breach.
  • Chapter VIII (S.124–147) — indemnity and guarantee. (Ch. VII repealed → Sale of Goods Act, 1930.)
  • Chapter IX (S.148–181) — bailment and pledge.
  • Chapter X (S.182–238) — agency. (Ch. XI repealed → Partnership Act, 1932.)
Exam orientation: Most AIBE questions are direct — a definition, a section number, or a short illustration. Master Section 2 definitions and the distinction tables and you secure the easy marks first.

Topic-wise Study

Chapter & section explanations

Open one topic at a time. Each card gives the relevant sections, a plain-English explanation, key points, an example from the Act, common traps, and an exam takeaway.

Section 2 is the dictionary of the whole Act. Almost everything else builds on these ten clauses.

  • Proposal / offer — S.2(a): when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or abstain from doing something, to obtain the other's assent.
  • Acceptance & Promise — S.2(b): when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent, the proposal is accepted; an accepted proposal becomes a promise.
  • Promisor & Promisee — S.2(c): the one making the proposal is the promisor; the one accepting is the promisee.
  • Consideration — S.2(d): when, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person does, abstains from doing, or promises to do/abstain, that act/abstinence/promise is the consideration.
  • Agreement — S.2(e): every promise and set of promises forming the consideration for each other.
  • Reciprocal promises — S.2(f): promises that form the consideration for each other.
  • Void agreement — S.2(g): an agreement not enforceable by law.
  • Contract — S.2(h): an agreement enforceable by law.
  • Voidable contract — S.2(i): enforceable at the option of one or more parties but not the other(s).
  • Contract becoming void — S.2(j): a contract that ceases to be enforceable becomes void when it so ceases.
Memory line: Offer + Acceptance = Promise. Promise + Consideration = Agreement. Agreement + Enforceability = Contract.
Trap: Every contract is an agreement, but every agreement is not a contract. A void agreement is void from the start; a voidable contract is valid until the aggrieved party avoids it.

Exam takeaway: Learn 2(g), 2(h), 2(i), 2(j) word-perfect — they appear almost every year.

This chapter fixes the exact moment offers and acceptances take effect — crucial for postal/telegram problems.

  • S.3: communication, acceptance and revocation are made by any act or omission intended to communicate, or which has that effect.
  • S.4 — when complete: a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the offeree. An acceptance is complete against the proposer when posted (out of the acceptor's power), and against the acceptor when it reaches the proposer. A revocation is complete against the maker when dispatched, and against the receiver when it reaches him.
  • S.5 — revocation timing: a proposal may be revoked any time before the acceptance is complete as against the proposer; an acceptance may be revoked any time before it is complete as against the acceptor.
  • S.6 — how revoked: by notice, by lapse of prescribed/reasonable time, by failure to fulfil a condition precedent, or by death/insanity of the proposer (if known to the acceptor before acceptance).
  • S.7 — acceptance must be absolute and unqualified, and expressed in a usual and reasonable manner.
  • S.8: performance of the conditions of a proposal (or accepting consideration) is itself acceptance.
  • S.9: a promise is express if made in words, implied if made otherwise than in words.
Illustration (S.4): A posts a letter offering to sell his house to B. B accepts by post. The acceptance binds A when B posts the letter, and binds B only when A receives it.
Trap: A counter-offer is not acceptance — S.7 requires acceptance to be absolute. A conditional "yes, but…" kills the original offer.

Exam takeaway: The S.4/S.5 timing rule is the most question-prone area. Remember: the proposer is bound first (on posting); the acceptor can still revoke before his acceptance reaches the proposer.

Section 10 is the master test. All agreements are contracts if they satisfy each ingredient below.

  • Free consent of the parties (S.13–22).
  • Competent parties (S.11–12).
  • Lawful consideration (S.23–25).
  • Lawful object (S.23).
  • Not expressly declared void by the Act (S.24–30, 56).

S.10 also preserves any law requiring a contract to be in writing, attested, or registered.

Trap: The Act does not separately list "intention to create legal relations" as a statutory ingredient of S.10 — that concept comes from case law, not from the bare words of S.10. For AIBE, stick to the five statutory essentials above.

Exam takeaway: If a question asks "essentials of a valid contract under the Act", answer from S.10's exact words: free consent, competency, lawful consideration, lawful object, not expressly void.

  • S.11 — who is competent: a person who (a) is of the age of majority, (b) is of sound mind, and (c) is not disqualified by any law. All three must be satisfied.
  • S.12 — sound mind: a person is of sound mind for contracting if, at the time of making it, he can understand it and form a rational judgment as to its effect on his interests. A usually-unsound person may contract during a lucid interval; a usually-sound person may not contract while temporarily unsound.

The three classes of incompetent persons are therefore: minors, persons of unsound mind, and persons disqualified by law.

Illustration (S.12): A patient in an asylum who is sane at intervals may contract during those intervals. A sane man too drunk to understand the terms cannot contract while so drunk.
Trap: S.11 fixes the age of majority "according to the law to which he is subject" — i.e. the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (18 years). The Contract Act itself does not state the number.

Exam takeaway: Watch the three-part test of S.11 and the lucid-interval rule of S.12.

  • S.13 — Consent: two or more persons consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense (consensus ad idem).
  • S.14 — Free consent: consent not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.
  • S.15 — Coercion: committing or threatening to commit any act forbidden by the IPC, or unlawfully detaining/threatening to detain property, to make a person enter an agreement.
  • S.16 — Undue influence: where one party is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses it to gain an unfair advantage. Domination is presumed in fiduciary/authority relations and where mental capacity is affected by age, illness, or distress. If the transaction is unconscionable, the dominant party must prove no undue influence.
  • S.17 — Fraud: false suggestion of fact, active concealment, a promise made with no intention to perform, any other act fitted to deceive, or any act the law declares fraudulent — done with intent to deceive. Mere silence is not fraud unless there is a duty to speak or silence equals speech.
  • S.18 — Misrepresentation: an innocent false statement, a breach of duty gaining an advantage by misleading, or innocently causing a mistake as to the substance of the subject.
  • S.19 — Effect: consent caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation makes the contract voidable at the option of the aggrieved party. Exception: not voidable for misrepresentation/silence if the party had the means to discover the truth with ordinary diligence.
  • S.19A — Undue influence: contract is voidable; the court may set it aside on just terms.
  • Mistake — S.20: bilateral mistake of fact essential to the agreement → void. S.21: mistake as to Indian law does not avoid; mistake as to foreign law is treated as mistake of fact. S.22: unilateral mistake of fact does not by itself make a contract voidable.
Illustration (S.19): A falsely tells B the factory makes 500 maunds of indigo a year and so induces B to buy it. The contract is voidable at B's option.
Trap: Coercion / fraud / misrepresentation / undue influence → voidable. Bilateral mistake of fact (S.20) → void. Don't mix these outcomes.

Exam takeaway: Remember the outcome of each vitiating factor and the S.19 "means of discovering the truth" exception.

  • S.23 — unlawful when it is forbidden by law; defeats the provisions of any law; is fraudulent; involves injury to person or property; or the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy. Such an agreement is void.
  • S.24: if any part of a single consideration/object is unlawful, the whole agreement is void.
  • S.25 — no consideration, no contract, with three exceptions: (1) written, registered, made on account of natural love and affection between near relations; (2) a promise to compensate someone who has already voluntarily done something for the promisor; (3) a written, signed promise to pay a time-barred debt. Also: a completed gift is valid (Expl.1) and inadequacy of consideration does not by itself make a contract void (Expl.2).
Illustration (S.25): A, for natural love and affection, promises in writing (and registers it) to give his son B Rs. 1,000. This is a contract.
Trap: Inadequacy of consideration ≠ absence of consideration. An inadequate price is still valid; the court only uses inadequacy as evidence on whether consent was free (S.25 Expl.2).

Exam takeaway: The three S.25 exceptions are a perennial favourite — memorise all three.

  • S.26 — restraint of marriage: every agreement in restraint of the marriage of any person (other than a minor) is void.
  • S.27 — restraint of trade: every agreement restraining a lawful profession, trade or business is void to that extent. Exception: a seller of goodwill may agree not to carry on a similar business within reasonable local limits.
  • S.28 — restraint of legal proceedings: agreements that absolutely restrict enforcement of rights, or limit the time to enforce, or extinguish rights on expiry of a period, are void. Exceptions: arbitration agreements, and certain bank/financial-institution guarantee clauses.
  • S.29 — uncertainty: agreements whose meaning is not certain or capable of being made certain are void.
  • S.30 — wager: agreements by way of wager are void; no suit lies to recover anything won. Exception: certain horse-racing prizes of Rs. 500 or more.
Illustration (S.29): "A agrees to sell B a hundred tons of oil" — with nothing to show what kind of oil — is void for uncertainty.
Trap: S.27 voids the restraint "to that extent" — partial restraints can still fail; only the sale-of-goodwill exception is statutory.

Exam takeaway: Pair each section with its one-line subject: 26-marriage, 27-trade, 28-legal proceedings, 29-uncertainty, 30-wager.

  • S.31 — definition: a contract to do or not do something if some event, collateral to the contract, does or does not happen.
  • S.32: contingent on an event happening — enforceable only when that event happens; void if the event becomes impossible.
  • S.33: contingent on an event not happening — enforceable when the happening becomes impossible.
  • S.34: where the event is the future conduct of a living person, it is deemed impossible when that person does something making it impossible to so act.
  • S.35: event within a fixed time — becomes void if the time expires without the event (or it becomes impossible earlier).
  • S.36: agreements contingent on an impossible event are void, whether or not the parties knew of the impossibility.
Illustration (S.31): A contracts to pay B Rs. 10,000 if B's house is burnt. This is a contingent contract.
Trap: A contingent contract is valid and enforceable on the event; a wager (S.30) is void. The event in a contingent contract is collateral; in a wager the event is the sole basis and parties have no other interest.

Exam takeaway: Keep the contingent-vs-wager distinction ready — it is a classic MCQ.

  • S.37: parties must perform or offer to perform; promises bind the representatives on death unless a contrary intention appears.
  • S.38: a valid tender (offer of performance) that is refused excuses the promisor — it must be unconditional, at proper time/place, with a reasonable chance to inspect.
  • S.39: if a party refuses to perform wholly or disables himself, the promisee may put an end to the contract unless he has acquiesced.
  • S.40–41: who performs — personally where intended (e.g. painting a picture), else a competent person may be employed; accepting performance from a third person discharges the promisor.
  • Joint promisors — S.42–45: joint liability devolves on survivors and representatives (42); the promisee may compel any one or more (43); release of one does not discharge the others (44); joint rights vest in all jointly (45).
  • Time & place — S.46–50: reasonable time where none specified (46); rules for specified time/place and for applications (47–50).
  • Reciprocal promises — S.51–54: a promisor need not perform unless the other is ready and willing (51); order of performance as fixed or as the nature requires (52); a party preventing performance makes it voidable at the other's option (53); default in the first-to-be-performed promise bars claiming the reciprocal (54).
  • S.55 — time as essence: failure to perform on time makes the contract voidable if time was essential; otherwise only compensation.
  • S.56 — impossibility / frustration: an agreement to do an impossible act is void; a contract that later becomes impossible or unlawful becomes void.
  • Appropriation of payments — S.59–61: apply as the debtor indicates (59); else as the creditor chooses (60); else to debts in order of time (61).
  • S.62–67 — need not be performed: novation, rescission or alteration (62); remission/waiver by promisee (63); consequences of rescinding a voidable contract (64); restoration of advantage under a void agreement (65); etc.
Illustration (S.56): A and B contract to marry; before the marriage A goes mad. The contract becomes void.
Trap: S.65 (restore the advantage) applies when an agreement is discovered to be void or a contract becomes void — learn it together with S.56.

Exam takeaway: Focus on S.37, 39, 51, 55, 56, 59–61, and 62. These carry most performance-chapter questions.

  • S.68 — necessaries: one who supplies necessaries (suited to his condition in life) to a person incapable of contracting, or to those he is bound to support, may be reimbursed from that incapable person's property.
  • S.69 — payment by interested person: a person interested in a payment which another is bound by law to make, and who pays it, is entitled to be reimbursed.
  • S.70 — non-gratuitous act: where one lawfully does/delivers something not intending it gratuitously, and the other enjoys the benefit, the latter must compensate or restore.
  • S.71 — finder of goods: a finder who takes goods into custody has the same responsibility as a bailee.
  • S.72 — money paid by mistake or coercion: a person to whom money is paid or a thing delivered by mistake or under coercion must repay or return it.
Illustration (S.70): A tradesman leaves goods at B's house by mistake; B treats them as his own. B must pay for them.
Trap: Reimbursement for necessaries (S.68) is from the incapable person's property, not personally — a minor is never personally liable.

Exam takeaway: Five sections, five fact-patterns. Match each illustration to its section.

  • S.73 — compensation: the party who suffers a breach may recover compensation for loss/damage that naturally arose in the usual course, or which the parties knew at the time of contracting to be likely. No compensation for remote or indirect loss. The same applies to obligations resembling contract.
  • S.74 — penalty / liquidated damages: where a sum is named, or a penalty stipulated, the aggrieved party is entitled to reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount named — whether or not actual loss is proved.
  • S.75 — rightful rescission: a person who rightfully rescinds is entitled to compensation for damage sustained through non-fulfilment.

Although the words "actual breach", "anticipatory breach" and "quantum meruit" are commonly used, the bare Act states the remedies through S.73–75; quantum meruit is reflected in restitution provisions like S.65 and S.70.

Illustration (S.74): A promises to pay B Rs. 1,000 if he fails to pay Rs. 500 on a given day, and defaults. B recovers reasonable compensation not exceeding Rs. 1,000.
Trap: Under Indian law (S.74) there is no rigid English-style distinction between "penalty" and "liquidated damages" — the court awards reasonable compensation up to the stipulated sum, and proof of actual loss is not always required.

Exam takeaway: S.73 (natural + known loss; no remote loss) and S.74 (reasonable compensation, ceiling = named sum) are heavily tested.

  • S.124 — indemnity: a contract where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor's conduct or by any other person's conduct.
  • S.125 — rights of the indemnity-holder: recover all damages, costs and sums paid under any compromise, when acting within authority.
  • S.126 — guarantee: a contract to perform the promise or discharge the liability of a third person on default. Parties: surety, principal debtor, creditor. May be oral or written.
  • S.127: anything done, or any promise made, for the benefit of the principal debtor is sufficient consideration for the surety.
  • S.128 — surety's liability: co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless otherwise provided.
  • S.129–131 — continuing guarantee: extends to a series of transactions (129); revocable as to future transactions by notice (130) or by the surety's death (131).
  • Discharge of surety — S.133–139: variance without consent (133), release/discharge of principal debtor (134), creditor giving time/composition/agreeing not to sue (135), and creditor's act impairing the surety's remedy (139). Mere forbearance does not discharge (137).
  • Rights of surety — S.140–141: on payment the surety steps into the creditor's rights (140 — subrogation) and is entitled to the creditor's securities (141).
  • S.142–143: guarantee obtained by misrepresentation or concealment by the creditor is invalid.
  • Co-sureties — S.146–147: liable to contribute equally (146); if bound in different sums, equally up to their limits (147).
Illustration (S.128): A guarantees payment of a bill of exchange by C. On dishonour, A is liable not only for the amount but also for interest and charges.
Trap: Indemnity has two parties; guarantee has three. Surety's liability is co-extensive (S.128), but in a continuing guarantee it can be revoked for the future (S.130/131).

Exam takeaway: Master S.124, 126, 128, 130/131, and the discharge sections 133–135 & 139.

  • S.148 — bailment: delivery of goods by one person (bailor) to another (bailee) for a purpose, on a contract that they be returned or disposed of as directed when the purpose is done.
  • S.150 — bailor's duty: disclose known faults; for goods bailed for hire, liable whether or not he knew of the fault.
  • S.151–152 — bailee's care: take as much care as a person of ordinary prudence would of his own goods; if he does, he is not liable for loss (152).
  • S.160–161 — return: return goods on expiry/accomplishment without demand; if not returned in time, the bailee is liable for any loss thereafter.
  • S.168–169 — finder of goods: may retain goods until compensation, may sue for a specific reward offered, and may sell in limited circumstances.
  • S.170–171 — lien: a particular lien for the bailee who added labour/skill (170); a general lien for bankers, factors, wharfingers, attorneys and policy-brokers (171).
  • Pledge — S.172: bailment of goods as security for a debt or performance; bailor is the pawnor, bailee the pawnee.
  • S.173–176 — pawnee's rights: retain for the debt, interest and necessary expenses (173); recover extraordinary expenses (175); on default, sue and retain, or sell after reasonable notice (176).
  • S.177 — pawnor's right to redeem any time before the actual sale.
Illustration (S.170): A gives a rough diamond to B, a jeweller, to cut and polish. B may retain the diamond until paid (particular lien).
Trap: In pledge the pawnee can sell on default after reasonable notice (S.176); a mere bailee generally cannot sell. Also note: general lien (S.171) is only for the five named classes.

Exam takeaway: Definitions (148, 172), care standard (151), and pawnee's remedies (176) are the must-knows.

  • S.182 — agent & principal: an agent is employed to do an act for another, or to represent another in dealings with third persons; the person represented is the principal.
  • S.183–184 — who may: a principal must be of the age of majority and sound mind; any person may be an agent as between principal and third parties, but a minor/unsound agent is not responsible to his principal.
  • S.185 — no consideration is necessary to create an agency.
  • S.186–189 — authority: express or implied (186–187); extends to everything necessary (188); and in an emergency, to acts a prudent person would do (189).
  • Sub-agents — S.190–195: generally an agent cannot delegate (190); a properly appointed sub-agent binds the principal (192); a substituted agent under S.194 is the principal's own agent, not a sub-agent.
  • Ratification — S.196–200: the principal may ratify acts done without authority (196); ratification may be express or implied (197), needs full knowledge (198), is of the whole transaction (199), and cannot injure a third person (200).
  • Termination — S.201–210: by revocation, renunciation, completion, death/insanity, or insolvency (201); agency coupled with interest cannot be terminated to the agent's prejudice (202); termination takes effect against the agent/third persons only when known to them (208).
  • Agent's duties — S.211–221: follow directions (211), use skill and diligence (212), render accounts (213), communicate (214), not make secret profit (215–216).
  • Principal's duties — S.222–225: indemnify against lawful acts (222) and good-faith acts (223); no indemnity for criminal acts (224).
  • Third persons — S.226–238: agent's contracts bind the principal as if made by him (226); rules where authority is exceeded (227–228), undisclosed principal (231–232), and effect of the agent's fraud/misrepresentation (238).
Illustration (S.189): An agent for sale may have goods repaired if necessary; or may sell perishable provisions that will not survive the journey.
Trap: A minor can be an agent (S.184) and bind the principal to third parties, but is not liable to the principal. Also: ratification needs full knowledge (S.198) and cannot prejudice third persons (S.200).

Exam takeaway: Definitions (182), "no consideration" (185), emergency authority (189), ratification rules (196–200), and modes of termination (201) are the high-frequency items.

Visual Aid

Flowchart — How an offer becomes an enforceable contract

Proposal / Offer
S.2(a)
Communication of proposal complete
S.3–4
Absolute & unqualified acceptance
S.7
Acceptance → Promise
S.2(b)
Supported by lawful consideration
S.2(d), 23–25
Promise + Consideration → Agreement
S.2(e)
Does it satisfy S.10?
free consent · competency · lawful object · not void
▼ YES
Valid CONTRACT
S.2(h)
▼ NO
Void / Voidable
S.2(g), 2(i)

Visual Aid

Mind Map — The Act at a glance

Indian Contract Act, 1872

Formation

S.3–9 offer & acceptance · S.10 essentials · S.2 definitions

Capacity & Consent

S.11–12 competency · S.13–22 free consent

Consideration & Object

S.23–25 lawful · S.26–30 void agreements

Contingent

S.31–36 collateral event

Performance

S.37–67 tender, reciprocal, time, impossibility, appropriation

Quasi-Contract

S.68–72 necessaries, finder, mistake

Breach & Remedies

S.73–75 damages, penalty, rescission

Indemnity & Guarantee

S.124–147 surety, continuing guarantee

Bailment & Pledge

S.148–181 care, lien, pawnee rights

Agency

S.182–238 authority, ratification, termination

Reference

Tables — definitions, distinctions & remedies

Table 1 · Core definitions (Section 2)

TermSectionMeaning (Bare Act)
Proposal2(a)Signifying willingness to do/abstain, to obtain assent.
Acceptance / Promise2(b)Assent to a proposal; an accepted proposal becomes a promise.
Consideration2(d)Act, abstinence or promise at the desire of the promisor.
Agreement2(e)Every promise / set of promises forming consideration for each other.
Void agreement2(g)An agreement not enforceable by law.
Contract2(h)An agreement enforceable by law.
Voidable contract2(i)Enforceable at the option of one or more parties only.
Contract becoming void2(j)A contract that ceases to be enforceable.

Table 2 · Key distinctions

BasisFirst conceptSecond concept
Void agreement vs Voidable contractVoid: not enforceable from the start; no legal effect (S.2g).Voidable: valid until avoided by the aggrieved party (S.2i).
Contingent vs WageringContingent (S.31): valid; event is collateral; parties have other interest.Wager (S.30): void; event is the sole basis; no other interest.
Coercion vs Undue influenceCoercion (S.15): physical/IPC threat or unlawful detaining of property.Undue influence (S.16): moral/mental domination of a weaker party.
Fraud vs MisrepresentationFraud (S.17): false statement made knowingly, with intent to deceive.Misrepresentation (S.18): false statement made innocently, believed true.
Indemnity vs GuaranteeIndemnity (S.124): two parties; promise to make good a loss.Guarantee (S.126): three parties; surety answers for another's default.
Bailment vs PledgeBailment (S.148): goods delivered for a purpose; return after.Pledge (S.172): goods delivered as security for a debt/performance.

Table 3 · Remedies, rights & key liabilities

SituationSectionRight / Remedy / Liability
Breach causing loss73Compensation for natural & known loss; not for remote loss.
Penalty / sum named74Reasonable compensation not exceeding the named sum.
Rightful rescission75Compensation for damage from non-fulfilment.
Surety's liability128Co-extensive with the principal debtor's.
Surety on payment140Gets all the creditor's rights against the principal debtor (subrogation).
Bailee's standard of care151Care of an ordinarily prudent person over his own goods.
Pawnee on default176Sue and retain, or sell after reasonable notice; recover any balance.
Principal indemnifies agent222–223For lawful acts and acts done in good faith.

Practice

AIBE-style MCQs (25)

Difficulty labels: Easy Moderate Hard. Answers and explanations are in the Answer Key section.

  1. Easy 1. An agreement enforceable by law is —

    • (a) a void agreement
    • (b) a contract
    • (c) a proposal
    • (d) a wager
  2. Easy 2. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 came into force on —

    • (a) 25 April 1872
    • (b) 1 September 1872
    • (c) 1 January 1872
    • (d) 1 September 1875
  3. Moderate 3. Communication of an acceptance by post is complete as against the proposer —

    • (a) when the letter reaches the proposer
    • (b) when the acceptor writes the letter
    • (c) when the letter is posted, out of the acceptor's power
    • (d) when the proposer reads it
  4. Easy 4. Under S.7, acceptance must be —

    • (a) conditional
    • (b) absolute and unqualified
    • (c) partial
    • (d) implied only
  5. Moderate 5. Which is NOT a mode of revoking a proposal under S.6?

    • (a) Notice of revocation
    • (b) Lapse of time
    • (c) Death/insanity of proposer known before acceptance
    • (d) Inadequacy of consideration
  6. Easy 6. The section listing essentials of a valid contract is —

    • (a) S.2
    • (b) S.10
    • (c) S.11
    • (d) S.23
  7. Moderate 7. A person of sound mind for contracting is defined in —

    • (a) S.11
    • (b) S.12
    • (c) S.13
    • (d) S.14
  8. Moderate 8. Coercion is defined in —

    • (a) S.15
    • (b) S.16
    • (c) S.17
    • (d) S.18
  9. Hard 9. Where the relation lets one party dominate the will of the other and obtain an unfair advantage, it is —

    • (a) coercion
    • (b) fraud
    • (c) undue influence
    • (d) misrepresentation
  10. Moderate 10. A false statement made innocently, believing it true, is —

    • (a) fraud
    • (b) misrepresentation
    • (c) coercion
    • (d) mistake
  11. Hard 11. A bilateral mistake of fact essential to the agreement makes it —

    • (a) valid
    • (b) voidable
    • (c) void
    • (d) illegal
  12. Moderate 12. Consent caused by fraud makes the contract —

    • (a) void
    • (b) voidable at the option of the deceived party
    • (c) valid
    • (d) illegal
  13. Easy 13. "No consideration, no contract" with exceptions is found in —

    • (a) S.10
    • (b) S.23
    • (c) S.24
    • (d) S.25
  14. Easy 14. An agreement in restraint of trade is void under —

    • (a) S.26
    • (b) S.27
    • (c) S.28
    • (d) S.29
  15. Moderate 15. Agreements by way of wager are void under —

    • (a) S.28
    • (b) S.29
    • (c) S.30
    • (d) S.31
  16. Easy 16. A contingent contract is defined in —

    • (a) S.31
    • (b) S.32
    • (c) S.33
    • (d) S.36
  17. Hard 17. The principle that compensation is not given for remote and indirect loss is in —

    • (a) S.73
    • (b) S.74
    • (c) S.75
    • (d) S.72
  18. Moderate 18. Under S.74, where a sum is named for breach, the aggrieved party gets —

    • (a) exactly the named sum always
    • (b) reasonable compensation not exceeding the named sum
    • (c) double the named sum
    • (d) nothing unless actual loss is proved
  19. Easy 19. A contract of guarantee has —

    • (a) two parties
    • (b) three parties
    • (c) one party
    • (d) four parties
  20. Moderate 20. The surety's liability under S.128 is —

    • (a) limited to half
    • (b) co-extensive with the principal debtor's
    • (c) always nil
    • (d) only for interest
  21. Easy 21. Bailment is defined in —

    • (a) S.148
    • (b) S.151
    • (c) S.172
    • (d) S.182
  22. Moderate 22. In a pledge, the bailor of the goods is called the —

    • (a) pawnee
    • (b) pawnor
    • (c) surety
    • (d) creditor
  23. Hard 23. On the pawnor's default, the pawnee may sell the goods (S.176) —

    • (a) without any notice
    • (b) after giving the pawnor reasonable notice of sale
    • (c) only with court permission always
    • (d) never
  24. Easy 24. To create an agency, consideration is —

    • (a) always necessary
    • (b) not necessary (S.185)
    • (c) necessary only in writing
    • (d) necessary only for sub-agents
  25. Hard 25. Ratification of an unauthorized act (S.200) —

    • (a) can injure a third person
    • (b) cannot be made to prejudice a third person
    • (c) needs no knowledge of facts
    • (d) is always void

Practice

Short-answer questions (15)

  1. Define "contract" and "agreement" and state the difference (S.2e, 2h).
  2. When is the communication of an acceptance complete against the proposer and against the acceptor? (S.4)
  3. List the modes by which a proposal is revoked (S.6).
  4. State the essentials of a valid contract under S.10.
  5. Who are incompetent to contract under S.11?
  6. Define coercion (S.15) and give one example.
  7. Distinguish fraud from misrepresentation (S.17 vs S.18).
  8. State the three exceptions to "no consideration, no contract" (S.25).
  9. Name any four void agreements under the Act (S.26–30).
  10. Define a contingent contract and give an example (S.31).
  11. What loss is recoverable, and what is not, under S.73?
  12. Explain the rule in S.74 regarding a stipulated penalty.
  13. Define a contract of guarantee and name its parties (S.126).
  14. What standard of care must a bailee take (S.151)?
  15. State the modes of termination of agency (S.201).

Practice

Descriptive / long-answer questions (8)

  1. Explain the rules relating to communication, acceptance and revocation of proposals (S.3–9) with illustrations.
  2. Discuss "free consent" and analyse the five vitiating factors with their effects on the contract (S.13–22).
  3. "No consideration, no contract." Examine this maxim and its exceptions under the Act (S.23–25).
  4. Discuss the various void agreements declared by the Act (S.26–30), with the statutory exceptions.
  5. Explain contingent contracts and distinguish them from wagering agreements (S.30–36).
  6. Examine the doctrine of impossibility/frustration of performance and the duty to restore advantage (S.56 & S.65).
  7. Explain a contract of guarantee, the surety's liability, and the modes of discharge of a surety (S.126–139).
  8. Discuss the creation, authority and termination of agency, including ratification (S.182–210).

Solutions

Answer Key

Study Plan

Roadmap — how to study this Act for AIBE 2026

1

Lock the definitions

Memorise S.2(a)–(j) and S.10. These secure the easy direct questions.

2

Formation block

S.3–9 communication/acceptance + S.11–12 capacity. Drill the postal timing rule (S.4–5).

3

Consent & consideration

S.13–22 vitiating factors (note void vs voidable) and S.23–25 consideration with exceptions.

4

Void & contingent

S.26–30 void agreements and S.31–36 contingent. Keep the contingent-vs-wager table handy.

5

Performance & breach

S.37–67 performance highlights and S.73–75 remedies. Focus on S.51, 55, 56, 73, 74.

6

Special contracts

S.124–147 indemnity/guarantee, S.148–181 bailment/pledge, S.182–238 agency.

7

Revise with tables & MCQs

Run the distinction tables, then solve the 25 MCQs and re-read wrong answers. Repeat weekly.

Last-mile

AIBE Quick Revision — section snapshots

S.2

Definitions: proposal, acceptance, consideration, agreement, void, contract, voidable.

S.4

Acceptance complete: against proposer on posting; against acceptor on receipt.

S.10

Essentials: consent, competency, consideration, object, not void.

S.11–12

Incompetent: minor, unsound mind, disqualified. Sound mind = understand + rational judgment.

S.15–18

Coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation — define each.

S.19/20

Coercion/fraud/misrep → voidable. Bilateral mistake of fact → void.

S.25

Three exceptions to no-consideration rule.

S.26–30

Void: marriage, trade, legal proceedings, uncertainty, wager.

S.31

Contingent = collateral event; valid, unlike a wager.

S.56

Subsequent impossibility/unlawfulness → contract void.

S.73–74

73: natural + known loss, no remote loss. 74: reasonable compensation ≤ named sum.

S.124/126

Indemnity = 2 parties; guarantee = 3 parties.

S.128

Surety's liability co-extensive with principal debtor.

S.148/172

Bailment = purpose + return; pledge = security for debt.

S.185

No consideration needed to create agency.

S.201

Agency ends: revocation, renunciation, completion, death/insanity, insolvency.

Disclaimer: This resource is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Content is summarised from the bare text of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 for AIBE 2026 preparation; always verify against the official Bare Act and current amendments.

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 · AIBE 2026 study resource · Built for exam revision

Scroll to Top